Template talk:Popular articles: Difference between revisions
m typofixx |
Melancholie (talk | contribs) m →New York Times reference: new section |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I'm trying to remove the floating ">>more" link on [[WP:POPULAR]] but the bot that updates this template overwrites the changes. Waiting to hear from bot-maintainer on [[User talk:Numbo3-bot#Duplicate links in Template:Popular_articles|bot's talk-page]]. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 07:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
I'm trying to remove the floating ">>more" link on [[WP:POPULAR]] but the bot that updates this template overwrites the changes. Waiting to hear from bot-maintainer on [[User talk:Numbo3-bot#Duplicate links in Template:Popular_articles|bot's talk-page]]. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 07:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:This is now possible by using the template with <code><nowiki>...|nolink=true}}</nowiki></code>. But the link has been changed anyway, see answer at [[User talk:Numbo3-bot#Duplicate links in Template:Popular_articles|bot's talk-page]]. --[[User:Numbo3|Numbo3]] ([[User talk:Numbo3|talk]]) 21:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC) |
:This is now possible by using the template with <code><nowiki>...|nolink=true}}</nowiki></code>. But the link has been changed anyway, see answer at [[User talk:Numbo3-bot#Duplicate links in Template:Popular_articles|bot's talk-page]]. --[[User:Numbo3|Numbo3]] ([[User talk:Numbo3|talk]]) 21:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
== New York Times reference == |
|||
Hmm, actually only [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Popular_articles&direction=prev&oldid=298654257 39,120] and not "more than 250,000 visitors went to the misspelled entry “[[Micheal Jackson]].”<!--sic!-->" ;-p The 250,000+ redirect was [[Michael jackson]] ;-) |
|||
BTW: It's a pity that any action path (/w/index.php) is ignored by our Squid cache servers, at least in counting them as "views" (/wiki/), actually inaccurate in respect of &oldid permalinks. Because of this we cannot see any meaningful jump [http://stats.grok.se/en/200906/Template%3APopular%20articles there], unfortunately. --[[User:Melancholie|Melancholie]] ([[User talk:Melancholie|talk]]) 22:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:55, 27 June 2009
 | On 26 June 2009, Template:Popular articles was linked from The New York Times, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
Alternative display options
I'd like to have this displayed on my user talk page similar to that implemented at User:Glover by proprietary tweaking. If it could fit above or below {{Signpost-subscription}} on my talk page that would suit my fancy presicely. Perhaps a small=yes field could be included? __meco (talk) 11:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- See Template:Popular_articles#Usage. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Display of more/standalone-page results
I'm trying to remove the floating ">>more" link on WP:POPULAR but the bot that updates this template overwrites the changes. Waiting to hear from bot-maintainer on bot's talk-page. DMacks (talk) 07:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is now possible by using the template with
...|nolink=true}}. But the link has been changed anyway, see answer at bot's talk-page. --Numbo3 (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
New York Times reference
Hmm, actually only 39,120 and not "more than 250,000 visitors went to the misspelled entry “Micheal Jackson.”" ;-p The 250,000+ redirect was Michael jackson ;-)
BTW: It's a pity that any action path (/w/index.php) is ignored by our Squid cache servers, at least in counting them as "views" (/wiki/), actually inaccurate in respect of &oldid permalinks. Because of this we cannot see any meaningful jump there, unfortunately. --Melancholie (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)