Eco-imperialism: Difference between revisions
Beau in NC (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Environmentalists have responded to this criticism by arguing that a healthy [[Natural environment|environment]]--and the regulations needed to sustain it--is a necessary part of raising global [[standards of living]]. The concept of [[sustainable development]] was developed in the 1970s to honor developing countries' desire for [[economic growth]] while also protecting the environment.{{Fact|date=December 2008}} |
Environmentalists have responded to this criticism by arguing that a healthy [[Natural environment|environment]]--and the regulations needed to sustain it--is a necessary part of raising global [[standards of living]]. The concept of [[sustainable development]] was developed in the 1970s to honor developing countries' desire for [[economic growth]] while also protecting the environment.{{Fact|date=December 2008}} |
||
Environmentalists have also argued that many of the problems facing [[developed countries]], such as [[climate change]], also pose significant or even greater threats to [[developing countries]] and thus warrant a global response. They also point out that the some solutions to problems of [[global hunger]], such as the growing of [[genetically modified crops]], fail to address (and in some cases actually exacerbate) the more fundamental problems of [[poverty]] and [[environmental degradation]] that created [[hunger]] in the first place.{{Fact|date=December 2008}} |
Environmentalists have also argued that many of the problems facing [[developed countries]], such as [[climate change]], also pose significant or even greater threats to [[developing countries]] and thus warrant a global response. They also point out that the some solutions to problems of [[global hunger]], such as the growing of [[genetically modified crops]], fail to address (and in some cases actually exacerbate) the more fundamental problems of [[poverty]] and [[environmental degradation]] that created [[hunger]] in the first place.{{Fact|date=December 2008}} |
||
Revision as of 01:19, 28 June 2009
- For the ecological effects of European expansion see Ecological imperialism.
Eco-imperialism is a term coined by Paul Driessen to refer to the forceful imposition of Western environmentalist views on developing countries. The degree to which this occurs is a topic of debate, as is whether such imposition would be ethically justifiable.
In his book Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death[1], Paul Driessen argues that like the European imperialists of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, today's eco-imperialists keep developing countries destitute for the benefit of the developed world.
By advocating for the precautionary principle, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development, Driessen claims, environmental groups legitimize their demands on government but often engender poverty and death in the process. Driessen also asserts that environmentalists' demands can sometimes cause environmental degradation.
Driessen's arguments are similar to those of environmental critic Bjørn Lomborg.
Some commentators maintain that eco-imperialism has a racial dimension, and occurs when environmentalists place the well-being of the environment over the well-being of humans, particularly non-whites, living in developing countries. Roy Innis, chairman of the Congress of Racial Equality has argued that European Union restrictions on the use of the pesticide DDT to combat malaria are killing 'black babies’. Environmental historian Ramachandra Guha has accused 'authoritarian' biologists of valuing the protection of endangered species over the well-being of local people in India and other developing countries.
Environmentalists have responded to this criticism by arguing that a healthy environment--and the regulations needed to sustain it--is a necessary part of raising global standards of living. The concept of sustainable development was developed in the 1970s to honor developing countries' desire for economic growth while also protecting the environment.[citation needed]
Environmentalists have also argued that many of the problems facing developed countries, such as climate change, also pose significant or even greater threats to developing countries and thus warrant a global response. They also point out that the some solutions to problems of global hunger, such as the growing of genetically modified crops, fail to address (and in some cases actually exacerbate) the more fundamental problems of poverty and environmental degradation that created hunger in the first place.[citation needed]
See also
References
- ^ Eco-Imperialism: Green Power Black Death by Paul Driessen
External links
- Chris Mooney, Mother Jones, May/June 2005, "Black Gold?" - CORE, ExxonMobil, and "eco-imperialism"
- Paul Dreissens site
 | This political science article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |