Jump to content

Garner's Modern English Usage: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DrilBot (talk | contribs)
m WikiProject Check Wikipedia cleanup (title linked in text) and general fixes; sort key per guidelines
Line 24: Line 24:


== Reception ==
== Reception ==
In the April 2001 issue of [[Harper's]], the novelist [[David Foster Wallace]] said, "The fact of the matter is that Garner's dictionary is extremely good ... Its format ... includes entries on individual words and phrases and expostulative small-cap MINI-ESSAYS."<ref>[http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/DFW_present_tense.html Harper's Magazine: Tense Present<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> (An unabridged, much lengthier version of the Wallace essay appeared in a 2006 anthology of Wallace's essays entitled ''[[Consider the Lobster]]''. Garrison Keillor has called Garner's Modern American Usage one of the five most influential books in his library. Other critics, from [[John Simon]] to [[William Safire]] to [[Bill Walsh]] to [[Barbara Wallraff]], have extolled the book's approach to giving guidance in a nuanced, non-hamhanded way.
In the April 2001 issue of [[Harper's]], the novelist [[David Foster Wallace]] said, "The fact of the matter is that Garner's dictionary is extremely good ... Its format ... includes entries on individual words and phrases and expostulative small-cap MINI-ESSAYS."<ref>[http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/DFW_present_tense.html Harper's Magazine: Tense Present<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> (An unabridged, much lengthier version of the Wallace essay appeared in a 2006 anthology of Wallace's essays entitled ''[[Consider the Lobster]]''.) Garrison Keillor has called Garner's Modern American Usage one of the five most influential books in his library. Other critics, from [[John Simon]] to [[William Safire]] to [[Bill Walsh]] to [[Barbara Wallraff]], have extolled the book's approach to giving guidance in a nuanced, non-hamhanded way.


[[Michael Quinion]] of WorldWideWords.org noted in his review<ref>[http://www.worldwidewords.org/reviews/re-gar1.htm World Wide Words: Garner’s Modern American Usage<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> that usage guides “row a course against the current of modern lexicography and linguistics,” which are descriptive fields that often fail to "meet the day-to-day needs of those users of English who want to speak and write in a way that is acceptable to educated opinion.” Quinion opined that Garner lays down rules without falling victim to “worn-out shibboleths or language superstitions.”
[[Michael Quinion]] of WorldWideWords.org noted in his review<ref>[http://www.worldwidewords.org/reviews/re-gar1.htm World Wide Words: Garner’s Modern American Usage<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> that usage guides “row a course against the current of modern lexicography and linguistics,” which are descriptive fields that often fail to "meet the day-to-day needs of those users of English who want to speak and write in a way that is acceptable to educated opinion.” Quinion opined that Garner lays down rules without falling victim to “worn-out shibboleths or language superstitions.”

Revision as of 16:48, 3 July 2009

Garner's Modern American Usage
AuthorBryan A. Garner
LanguageEnglish
SubjectStyle guide
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date
1998
Publication placeUnited States
ISBN0195161912

Garner's Modern American Usage, edited by Bryan Garner, is a usage guide for contemporary American English. Modern American Usage covers issues of usage, pronunciation, and style, from plurals and literary techniques to distinctions between similar words and the usage of foreign terms.

The first edition was published in 1998 as A Dictionary of Modern American Usage. In 2003, the second edition was published under the current title with a third more content than its predecessor.[1] A third edition is scheduled for publication and release in July 2009. Oxford University Press has also published an abridged, paperback edition of Modern American Usage as the Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style (2000).

Reception

In the April 2001 issue of Harper's, the novelist David Foster Wallace said, "The fact of the matter is that Garner's dictionary is extremely good ... Its format ... includes entries on individual words and phrases and expostulative small-cap MINI-ESSAYS."[2] (An unabridged, much lengthier version of the Wallace essay appeared in a 2006 anthology of Wallace's essays entitled Consider the Lobster.) Garrison Keillor has called Garner's Modern American Usage one of the five most influential books in his library. Other critics, from John Simon to William Safire to Bill Walsh to Barbara Wallraff, have extolled the book's approach to giving guidance in a nuanced, non-hamhanded way.

Michael Quinion of WorldWideWords.org noted in his review[3] that usage guides “row a course against the current of modern lexicography and linguistics,” which are descriptive fields that often fail to "meet the day-to-day needs of those users of English who want to speak and write in a way that is acceptable to educated opinion.” Quinion opined that Garner lays down rules without falling victim to “worn-out shibboleths or language superstitions.”

Other reviewers have been slightly more reserved in their praise. Geoffrey Pullum of Language Log, the distinctly descriptive-leaning editor of the The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, writes that Garner's approach is “very reasonably balanced between prescriptive and descriptive approaches.” Pullum, however, is critical of the book's failure to reflect “the progress that has been made toward correcting mistakes" in the analysis of English syntax made by 18th and 19th century linguists.[4]

References

See also

Similar works