User talk:Thearmed1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/173.89.236.193|173.89.236.193]] ([[User talk:173.89.236.193|talk]]) 21:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/173.89.236.193|173.89.236.193]] ([[User talk:173.89.236.193|talk]]) 21:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
You're still evading the point I'm getting at. |
|||
By any standards, what makes Empire Earth Heaven's link Wikipedia-worthy? A half-dozen references are from that fansite and I don't see where it's listed as "official." Also, the Wikipedia's standards say that everything must be from a "reliable, published sources." Technically, any information uploaded to the internet for public viewing is considered published. On the other hand, only opinion can determine what is reliable. This totally contradicts the principle of making this encyclopedia entirely fact. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/173.89.236.193|173.89.236.193]] ([[User talk:173.89.236.193|talk]]) 22:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:12, 9 July 2009
You also seem to believe that I'm the same spammer that you got blocked earlier. And you also fail to recognize the reference to the official Sierra announcement which states that the multiplayer servers were shut down. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, yet it seems that you want any useful information to be removed.
The section is there solely to help the Empire Earth community and there was no problem with it being there until you came along.
173.89.236.193 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok, so I didn't notice that someone moved it up there awhile back, but that still doesn't explain why you think players should be left in the dark about an alternative multiplayer experience.
173.89.236.193 (talk) 21:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
You're still evading the point I'm getting at.
By any standards, what makes Empire Earth Heaven's link Wikipedia-worthy? A half-dozen references are from that fansite and I don't see where it's listed as "official." Also, the Wikipedia's standards say that everything must be from a "reliable, published sources." Technically, any information uploaded to the internet for public viewing is considered published. On the other hand, only opinion can determine what is reliable. This totally contradicts the principle of making this encyclopedia entirely fact.