User talk:FisherQueen: Difference between revisions
FisherQueen (talk | contribs) →The bigger picture...: reply |
|||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
::::::::If it does not accomplish anything to block Penguin for the great many things he has done, how is it so that it applies for MataNui? BTW, that revert was completely unnecessary, be cause I put an internal which at that page had the references. --[[Special:Contributions/76.95.66.209|76.95.66.209]] ([[User talk:76.95.66.209|talk]]) 21:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
::::::::If it does not accomplish anything to block Penguin for the great many things he has done, how is it so that it applies for MataNui? BTW, that revert was completely unnecessary, be cause I put an internal which at that page had the references. --[[Special:Contributions/76.95.66.209|76.95.66.209]] ([[User talk:76.95.66.209|talk]]) 21:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::MataNui was blocked because he was currently edit-warring. I don't know why the Penguin wasn't blocked at the same time, because I didn't block him. If you are curious about that, you could ask the administrator who did block him. I don't have any opinion at all about whatever subjects are under dispute there, but you are welcome to try some of the solutions at [[WP:DISPUTE]] if there are disagreements that you need additional opinions on. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 21:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
:::::::::MataNui was blocked because he was currently edit-warring. I don't know why the Penguin wasn't blocked at the same time, because I didn't block him. If you are curious about that, you could ask the administrator who did block him. I don't have any opinion at all about whatever subjects are under dispute there, but you are welcome to try some of the solutions at [[WP:DISPUTE]] if there are disagreements that you need additional opinions on. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 21:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
::::::::::Can't you block Penguin, you can see it's warranted? --[[Special:Contributions/76.95.66.209|76.95.66.209]] ([[User talk:76.95.66.209|talk]]) 21:40, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Quick Question == |
== Quick Question == |
Revision as of 21:40, 11 July 2009
FisherQueen
| |
---|---|
![]() SnarkyThis gave me a good laugh. Snarky as hell and damned funny :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
About a blockDear FisherQueen, I am sorry that I'm using this channel to communicate with you but as an old wikipedia lover, I am really dissappointed by this matter. I have noticed the blocking on User:Socrates.awmn, I have read your explanation and I would like to give you some advice on the matter since I strongly believe that you have been mislead by someone. AWMN is not a business and thus it cannot be "advertised" in the commercial sense. As the article explains, it is an open community of human beings, no profit, no selling, no material gain involved whatsoever, only knowledge and fun. There is however a strong competition for control and a lot of arrogance since it is composed by a 99% male community. I do strongly, very strongly, believe that some envy person reported socrates.awmn for "advertising" and this lead to the block. If you spoke Greek you could visit the webpages related to AWMN and then you would immediately realise that it is a genuine non-profit hobby and that there is no realistic conflict of interest of any kind. However, you obviously do not speak Greek and thus I understand that it might have looked like a clear violation of rules while scorates.awmn was just presenting the community. I strongly suggest to invite some Greek speaker to review the AWMN web page and the forum and advise you if he believes that AWMN can be classified as a business in any way. If you are still not satisfied and you are still unwilling to unblock the user then please write your comments on socrates.awmn's talk so that we could see that you took this message under consideration. --racergr (talk) 10:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC) The bigger picture......is that you were wrong about blocking User: MataNui44. That is because you probably haven't seen what he has been up to on the Code Lyoko page. He has violated the 3 Revert Rule (July 10; Code Lyoko), reliable sources rules several times and has reverted everyone else's edits. There is nothing wrong with that picture? I tried editing myself on one of the pages, which even had an internal link as well as sources at that link, and he still deleted it. You gave MataNui44 a block? He did nothing wrong, in fact if he did anything, he protected wikipedia, not start an edit war. I think you should disbar the ban from MataNui44 and place it with Rouge Penguin. --76.95.66.209 (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick QuestionIf an article is blatant vandalism but another editor started an AfD on it, can you still add a speedy tag or must you wait out the AfD process. The article in question is Call of duty 9 have a look at the main characters name 'Lt.Wann Kerr' thanks. BigDunc 21:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
|