Talk:Megatron (other incarnations): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Over $700 million for each of the two movies... does that tell you something? The live-action movies now have their own expansive continuity with comics, sequels, novels, etc. and I think that the movie incarnations of the Transformers characters should be moved off this page and onto their own articles, such as [[Optimus Prime (films)]] and [[Megatron (films)]] I made a split proposal; I know that it's normally used for articles that are too large, but due to the expansiveness and popularity of the Transformers movie universe, I believe that the film's characters should have their own article, especially since there are arguably more "pointless" articles on movie characters such as [[Mikaela Banes]].----[[User:Eh! Steve|Eh! Steve]] ([[User talk:Eh! Steve|talk]]) 13:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
Over $700 million for each of the two movies... does that tell you something? The live-action movies now have their own expansive continuity with comics, sequels, novels, etc. and I think that the movie incarnations of the Transformers characters should be moved off this page and onto their own articles, such as [[Optimus Prime (films)]] and [[Megatron (films)]] I made a split proposal; I know that it's normally used for articles that are too large, but due to the expansiveness and popularity of the Transformers movie universe, I believe that the film's characters should have their own article, especially since there are arguably more "pointless" articles on movie characters such as [[Mikaela Banes]].----[[User:Eh! Steve|Eh! Steve]] ([[User talk:Eh! Steve|talk]]) 13:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:The amount of money a film generates doesn't along justify a new article, but the size of the article might justify splitting off the largest character. I'm wary of the name though. Any alternate names? We until now no Michael Bay film characters have sported an article title that mentioned the film series. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 14:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
:The amount of money a film generates doesn't along justify a new article, but the size of the article might justify splitting off the largest character. I'm wary of the name though. Any alternate names? We until now no Michael Bay film characters have sported an article title that mentioned the film series. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 14:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
::How about titles like [[Megatron (live-action films)]], [[Megatron (Transformers films)]], [[Megatron (live-action film continuity)]], [[Megatron (film continuity)]] or [[Megatron (Michael Bay films)]]?--[[Special:Contributions/142.222.102.37|142.222.102.37]] ([[User talk:142.222.102.37|talk]]) 22:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
::How about titles like [[Megatron (live-action films)]], [[Megatron (Transformers films)]], [[Megatron (live-action film continuity)]], [[Megatron (film continuity)]], [[Megatron (Michael Bay Transformers)]] or [[Megatron (Michael Bay films)]]?--[[Special:Contributions/142.222.102.37|142.222.102.37]] ([[User talk:142.222.102.37|talk]]) 22:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:37, 22 July 2009
Individual articles for movie incarnations of Transformers
Over $700 million for each of the two movies... does that tell you something? The live-action movies now have their own expansive continuity with comics, sequels, novels, etc. and I think that the movie incarnations of the Transformers characters should be moved off this page and onto their own articles, such as Optimus Prime (films) and Megatron (films) I made a split proposal; I know that it's normally used for articles that are too large, but due to the expansiveness and popularity of the Transformers movie universe, I believe that the film's characters should have their own article, especially since there are arguably more "pointless" articles on movie characters such as Mikaela Banes.----Eh! Steve (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- The amount of money a film generates doesn't along justify a new article, but the size of the article might justify splitting off the largest character. I'm wary of the name though. Any alternate names? We until now no Michael Bay film characters have sported an article title that mentioned the film series. Mathewignash (talk) 14:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)