Jump to content

Shirley McKie: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 35: Line 35:
The Scottish parliament decided to refer the McKie case to its Justice 1 Committee whose inquiry began in April 2006 and took evidence from more than 30 witnesses. Ms McKie, accompanied by her father Iain and a team of legal advisers, appeared before the committee of [[Member of the Scottish Parliament|MSP]]s on [[23 May]] [[2006]].<ref>[http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1385&id=768692006 McKie appears before parliamentary inquiry]</ref> Her accusers &ndash; the four [[SCRO]] fingerprint officers Hugh Macpherson, Fiona McBride, Anthony McKenna and Charles Stewart &ndash; appeared a week later on [[30 May]] [[2006]]. The Justice 1 Committee proceeded to request the Scottish Executive to provide it with four McKie case reports:
The Scottish parliament decided to refer the McKie case to its Justice 1 Committee whose inquiry began in April 2006 and took evidence from more than 30 witnesses. Ms McKie, accompanied by her father Iain and a team of legal advisers, appeared before the committee of [[Member of the Scottish Parliament|MSP]]s on [[23 May]] [[2006]].<ref>[http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1385&id=768692006 McKie appears before parliamentary inquiry]</ref> Her accusers &ndash; the four [[SCRO]] fingerprint officers Hugh Macpherson, Fiona McBride, Anthony McKenna and Charles Stewart &ndash; appeared a week later on [[30 May]] [[2006]]. The Justice 1 Committee proceeded to request the Scottish Executive to provide it with four McKie case reports:
*the [[James Mackay QPM|Mackay]] report;'
*the [[James Mackay QPM|Mackay]] report;'
*two reports by fingerprint expert, John MacLeod '''(Allan Bayles friend, Gary Dempsters <Shirley McKies partner> friend , all three of whom got it wrong in the Sutherland print in a SNP backed campaign against the SCRO)'''; and,
*two reports by fingerprint expert, John MacLeod; and,
*the report by independent expert, Michael Pass.
*the report by independent expert, Michael Pass.
Although the Lord Advocate, [[Colin Boyd]], responded by refusing to release the Mackay report for reasons relating to "fundamental principles of our democracy, including the presumption of innocence", Justice minister [[Cathy Jamieson]] agreed to release to MSPs reports by John MacLeod and Michael Pass.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/5099754.stm Lord Advocate, Colin Boyd, refuses to release Mackay report]</ref> Despite Boyd's refusal, a leaked copy of Mackay's 56-page report was published by the BBC.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4969830.stm Text of James Mackay's report published by the BBC]</ref>
Although the Lord Advocate, [[Colin Boyd]], responded by refusing to release the Mackay report for reasons relating to "fundamental principles of our democracy, including the presumption of innocence", Justice minister [[Cathy Jamieson]] agreed to release to MSPs reports by John MacLeod and Michael Pass.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/5099754.stm Lord Advocate, Colin Boyd, refuses to release Mackay report]</ref> Despite Boyd's refusal, a leaked copy of Mackay's 56-page report was published by the BBC.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4969830.stm Text of James Mackay's report published by the BBC]</ref>

Revision as of 19:29, 3 August 2009

Shirley McKie is a former Scottish police detective who was accused by experts from the Scottish Criminal Record Office (SCRO) of leaving her thumb print on the bathroom door frame of a murder crime-scene in Kilmarnock, Ayrshire, on 14 January 1997. Denying she had ever been inside the house of murder victim Marion Ross, whose body was discovered on 8 January 1997, Detective Constable McKie was initially suspended then sacked by Strathclyde Police, arrested in 1998 and tried but acquitted in 1999.

In March 2008, with continuing public concern over what is known as the Shirley McKie fingerprint scandal, Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill announced that a public inquiry into the case is to begin in September 2008.[1][2]

Case in brief

In January, 1996, the body of Marion Ross, 51, was found in her home in Kilmarnock, Scotland. She had been stabbed multiple times during what is presumed to have been a burglary. David Asbury, a handyman who had once worked on the Ross house, developed as a suspect. A fingerprint found on a tin box in Asbury's home was reported to be that of Marion Ross by examiners at the Scottish Criminal Records Office. The SCRO also reported they had identified a fingerprint found on the gift tag on an unopened Christmas present inside the Ross home as that of David Asbury. While checking other, unidentified fingerprints from the victim's home, examiners reported one of those prints to have been identified as Constable Mckie's. During Asbury's murder trial in which he was found guilty, McKie testified she had not been inside the home and could not have left her fingerprint. [3]

Because Marion Ross was known to hoard possessions, making it possible for Asbury to have left a print on the gift tag years earlier while he was working at the home, the print on the tin box in Asbury's home became the key piece of evidence in the case against him. McKie's testimony at Asbury's trial that she could not have left a print inside the Ross home implied, if true, that the SCRO examiners were capable of error in a fingerprint comparison. David Asbury was subsequently freed from a life sentence due to questions raised about the identification of the print on the tin box. Other features of the case include allegations that police tried to link Constable McKie to the actual murder and that they conducted a whispering campaign alleging that she denied entering the murder scene because she had conducted a sexual liaison there with a married male detective. [4]

Perjury

In March 1998, DC McKie was arrested in a dawn raid and charged with perjury. However, in May 1999, the Scottish jury at the High Court of Justiciary rejected the SCRO's fingerprint evidence and McKie was unanimously found not guilty of perjury. U.S. fingerprint expert Pat Wertheim and former SCRO examiner Allen Bayle testified during McKie's trial that the fingerprint inside the Ross house was not McKie's.[5]

Compensation

McKie sued her employers regarding the manner in which she was arrested but, in February 2003, lost the case against Strathclyde Police and faced a legal bill of £13,000. McKie faced bankruptcy as a result, and she had to be treated for depression. An anonymous donor paid the legal bill in June 2004 and McKie was reported to be "absolutely overjoyed".[6]

A second civil action was then raised suing the Scottish Executive amongst others on the basis that a malicious prosecution had been caused by dishonesty of the SCRO fingerprint experts. On the morning that this was to be heard, in February 2006, McKie was offered and accepted £750,000 from the Scottish Executive in full settlement of her compensation claim (By the first day of her civil case her claim had grown by £500'000 over her original £750'000, very kind of her to NOT take the stand and save the taxpayer even more money), without admission of liability. The case was then dropped. At an earlier stage of the case against the Scottish Executive the Lord Advocate Colin Boyd argued that expert witnesses should always be immune from prosecution – even if they gave false evidence.

Parliamentary inquiry

The Scottish parliament decided to refer the McKie case to its Justice 1 Committee whose inquiry began in April 2006 and took evidence from more than 30 witnesses. Ms McKie, accompanied by her father Iain and a team of legal advisers, appeared before the committee of MSPs on 23 May 2006.[7] Her accusers – the four SCRO fingerprint officers Hugh Macpherson, Fiona McBride, Anthony McKenna and Charles Stewart – appeared a week later on 30 May 2006. The Justice 1 Committee proceeded to request the Scottish Executive to provide it with four McKie case reports:

  • the Mackay report;'
  • two reports by fingerprint expert, John MacLeod; and,
  • the report by independent expert, Michael Pass.

Although the Lord Advocate, Colin Boyd, responded by refusing to release the Mackay report for reasons relating to "fundamental principles of our democracy, including the presumption of innocence", Justice minister Cathy Jamieson agreed to release to MSPs reports by John MacLeod and Michael Pass.[8] Despite Boyd's refusal, a leaked copy of Mackay's 56-page report was published by the BBC.[9]

In September 2006, the four fingerprint officers were reported to have been offered a deal by the SCRO to resign or take early retirement. Their union, Unison, criticised the timing of the offer (before the Justice 1 Committee had reported) and argued that the SCRO officers were being "harassed".[10]

The report of the Justice 1 committee of the Scottish parliament published its 230-page report on 15 February 2007 (pages 189-190 deal specifically with Ms McKie's out-of-court settlement).[11]

Public inquiry

Following the out-of-court settlement, Opposition parties in the Scottish parliament called for a public inquiry to be held into the McKie case. In March 2006, Shirley McKie's father, Iain, and Dr Jim Swire, father of Lockerbie bombing victim, Flora, met to launch a campaign for a judicial inquiry which they hoped would investigate recent revelations of a link between the McKie case and the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial. After the meeting, Dr Swire said:

"The reputation of our country and its criminal justice system will depend upon how these cases are sorted out."[12]

However, the Scottish Executive ruled out any question of a judicial inquiry (which has the power to compel the attendance of witnesses) whilst Shirley McKie and her family announced their campaign for a public inquiry would end on January 9, 2007 – exactly ten years after the Marion Ross murder investigation began:

"We have given ten years of our lives to this and we are not giving any more. It is the politicians' job now to do something about it," said her father, Iain McKie. "It is not our role to fight for justice: it is their role."[13]

In October 2008, it was announced that a public inquiry into the case led by former Northern Ireland judge Sir Anthony Campbell is to meet in Glasgow.[14] A procedural hearing is scheduled for 21 November 2008 and proceedings start early in 2009.[15]

Inquiry proceedings

Sir Anthony Campbell opened the inquiry proceedings at 10.30 am on Tuesday 2 June 2009 in Maryhill Community Central Hall, Glasgow. Following Sir Anthony's introductory statement, senior counsel to the inquiry, Gerry Moynihan QC, made a public presentation of all the material that has been collected. Thereafter, lawyers for the core participants are expected to make their opening statements. The hearing of oral evidence is scheduled to commence at 10.15 am on Tuesday 9 June.[16][17]

Protest song

Scottish folk singer and poet, Michael Marra, has written a protest song condemning the "lies" surrounding the McKie case. The song opens:

"I am Shirley McKie/She is me and I am she/You are too, Shirley is you/We are she because Shirley is we."

Referring to first minister, Jack McConnell, the lyrics continue:

"We lecture children if they're telling lies/They will not prosper and they will not thrive.../And even the first minister must sometimes stand naked."[1]

Publications

Shirley McKie: The Price of Innocence by Iain McKie and Michael Russell MSP, published 18 April 2007, ISBN 9781841585758, price £7.99, from Waterstones or Birlinn

References

  1. ^ Northern Irish judge will head McKie print inquiry
  2. ^ Scottish Police Services Authority : Public Inquiry FAQ
  3. ^ Latent print examination - McKie case
  4. ^ David Jones (2007-04-25). "Flawed fingerprint evidence led to travesty of justice". Mail On Sunday. Retrieved 2009-06-03.
  5. ^ Shelley Jofre (2001-07-08). "Fingerprint evidence challenged". BBC Panorama. Retrieved 2009-06-03.
  6. ^ BBC report on the McKie fingerprint case
  7. ^ McKie appears before parliamentary inquiry
  8. ^ Lord Advocate, Colin Boyd, refuses to release Mackay report
  9. ^ Text of James Mackay's report published by the BBC
  10. ^ Fingerprint officers are offered deal by SCRO
  11. ^ Justice 1 committee report into the McKie case
  12. ^ Iain McKie and Dr Jim Swire call for judicial inquiry
  13. ^ McKie's campaign for public inquiry to end
  14. ^ McKie public inquiry to meet
  15. ^ The Fingerprint Inquiry, Scotland
  16. ^ "Inquiry Announcements and Notices".
  17. ^ "McKie inquiry evidence to start". BBC News. 2009-06-01. Retrieved 2009-06-02.