Jump to content

Global Witness: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Profile: Internal link for phrase in text
Line 2: Line 2:


==Profile==
==Profile==
Global Witness states that their goals are to expose the corrupt exploitation of natural resources and international trade systems, to drive campaigns that end [[impunity]], resource linked conflict, and [[human right]]s and environmental abuses.<ref>Global Witness, about us. http://www.globalwitness.org/pages/en/about_us.html</ref>
Global Witness states that their goals are to expose the corrupt [[exploitation of natural resources]] and international trade systems, to drive campaigns that end [[impunity]], resource linked conflict, and [[human right]]s and environmental abuses.<ref>Global Witness, about us. http://www.globalwitness.org/pages/en/about_us.html</ref>


Global Witness’ methodology combines investigative research, publishing reports and conducting advocacy campaigns. Global Witness reports are disseminated to [[governments]], [[intergovernmental organizations]], [[civil society]] and the [[News media|media]]. This is intended to shape global policy and change international thinking about the extraction and trading of [[natural resources]] and the impacts their [[corrupt]] and [[sustainable|unsustainable]] [[exploitation]] can have upon [[human development (humanity)|development]], [[human rights]] and [[geopolitical]] and [[economic]] [[stability]].{{Fact|date=September 2008}}
Global Witness’ methodology combines investigative research, publishing reports and conducting advocacy campaigns. Global Witness reports are disseminated to [[governments]], [[intergovernmental organizations]], [[civil society]] and the [[News media|media]]. This is intended to shape global policy and change international thinking about the extraction and trading of [[natural resources]] and the impacts their [[corrupt]] and [[sustainable|unsustainable]] [[exploitation]] can have upon [[human development (humanity)|development]], [[human rights]] and [[geopolitical]] and [[economic]] [[stability]].{{Fact|date=September 2008}}

Revision as of 02:49, 9 August 2009

Global Witness is an international NGO established in 1993 that works to break the links between natural resource exploitation, conflict, poverty, corruption, and human rights abuses worldwide. The organisation has offices in London and Washington, D.C.. Global Witness states that it does not have any political affiliation.

Profile

Global Witness states that their goals are to expose the corrupt exploitation of natural resources and international trade systems, to drive campaigns that end impunity, resource linked conflict, and human rights and environmental abuses.[1]

Global Witness’ methodology combines investigative research, publishing reports and conducting advocacy campaigns. Global Witness reports are disseminated to governments, intergovernmental organizations, civil society and the media. This is intended to shape global policy and change international thinking about the extraction and trading of natural resources and the impacts their corrupt and unsustainable exploitation can have upon development, human rights and geopolitical and economic stability.[citation needed]

Global Witness’ investigations and advocacy campaigns have been both a catalyst for and a driver of a number of international mechanisms and initiatives established to regulate natural resource trading and promote accountability around revenues raised. Examples of such mechanisms include the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, the stated objective of which is ‘to increase transparency over payments and revenues in the extractives sector in countries heavily dependent on these resources’.[2]

Global Witness developed a concept they call Independent Forest Monitoring (IFM), a tool for assessing and strengthening legal compliance in the forest sector internationally.[3]

Honors and awards

Global Witness and Partnership Africa Canada were jointly nominated by U.S. House of Representatives and Senate members for the 2003 Nobel Peace Prize for work on links between conflict and diamonds in several African countries. In 2005, Global Witness received the Gleitsman Foundation prize for international activism.[4]


Work

Global Witness has investigated and exposed issues around the role of diamonds and other natural resources in funding conflict, how specific individuals and business entities have encouraged and maintained debilitating natural resource linked corruption and conflict, illegal and unsustainable forest exploitation, corruption and opacity in oil, gas and mining industries and the role of financial institutions in supporting conflict and corruption.

History has shown through examples such as Liberia and the Democratic Republic of Congo that natural resources can be exploited to fund armies and militias who murder, rape and commit other human rights abuses against civilians. Global Witness advocates that only by ensuring that investments in the natural resource sector are sustainable, equitable, transparent, and non-corrupt, will they result in long-term benefits for populations rather than being used to fuel conflict, corruption and entrenched poverty. Global Witness conducts in-depth investigations to inform comprehensive research reports that analyse and expose the relationships between natural resource exploitation and conflict. Global Witness uses these reports as part of sustained, targeted advocacy campaigns aimed at influencing key policy makers at the international, regional and national level to create, strengthen and systemise mechanisms to enable the international community to react quickly and effectively when instances of natural resource funded conflicts occur.

Global Witness has been recognised for its instrumental role in documenting the trail of natural resource exploitation in countries across the globe.[5] In 1998 Global Witness released the report ‘A Rough Trade – The Role of Companies and Governments in the Angolan Conflict’ uncovering the role of the international diamond trade in funding the Angolan Civil War. This report, and further Global Witness campaigning, played an integral role in the creation of the 2003 Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS). The KPCS, an international agreement to prevent the trade in conflict diamonds, counts 71 countries as voluntary participants. As an observer of the Kimberley Process, Global Witness meets once a year with participating governments and other observers, such as the diamond industry and other NGOs, to inform the development of the scheme. Global Witness is also active in numerous working groups which monitor participants' implementation of the scheme, assess applications to join, gather and analyze statistics and discuss technical issues.

Global Witness has led calls for the disclosure of public revenues earned from the extraction and sale of natural resources. Global Witness conceived and co-launched the Publish What You Pay (PWYP) coalition, which now counts over 300 civil society groups across the globe as members. Other PWYP founders include CAFOD, Oxfam, Save the Children UK, Transparency International UK and George Soros, Chairman of the Open Society Institute. PYWP promotes greater transparency in the oil, gas and mining industries by calling for the mandatory disclosure of the payments made by oil, gas and mining companies’ to governments for the extraction of natural resources. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which was announced by then UK Prime Minister Tony Blair at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in September 2002 and formally endorsed by the World Bank in December 2003, is a direct result of the efforts of the PWYP campaigners and is now supported by a majority of the world’s oil, mining and gas companies and institutional investors worth US$8.3 trillion.[6] Global Witness is a member of the EITI International Advisory Group, established in 2005 to guide the work of the International EITI Secretariat in defining and refining proposals on the future of the EITI and sits on the EITI Board.

Global Witness advocates for pro-poor alternatives to industrial scale logging and universal measures to curb destructive illegal logging practices. Global Witness promotes an ‘optimal use' scenario that first and foremost benefits forest dependent people, sustainable development and the environment. Global Witness' work on conflict timber was responsible for shutting down the timber industries that provided the funds that fuelled the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and Charles Taylor's regime in Liberia and influenced the closure of the Chinese/Burmese border to timber traffic in 2006.

Global Witness has pioneered and delivered Independent Forest Monitoring (IFM).

Recent

Global Witness made recent headlines in June 2007 after the Cambodian government banned the distribution of the organisation’s new report Cambodia's Family Trees: Illegal logging and the stripping of public assets by Cambodia's elite. This report details the activities of Cambodia's most powerful illegal logging syndicate - known as the Seng Keang Company and implicates relatives of Prime Minister Hun Sen and other senior government officials in the syndicate. The prime minister's brother, Hun Neng, who is also a provincial governor, was quoted in a Cambodian newspaper as saying if anyone from Global Witness staff returned to Cambodia, he would beat him on the head until it broke."[7]

The impact of Cambodia’s Family Trees can also be seen through its mention in the U.S. Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriation Draft Bill, 2008 where the Committee urged the administration to ‘prohibit corrupt Cambodian officials identified in the June 2007 Global Witness report entitled Cambodia's Family Trees: Illegal Logging and the Stripping of Public Assets by Cambodia's Elite from entering the United States. The Committee also encouraged other countries, particularly in Europe and Asia, to do the same.[8]

Income

The majority of Global Witness’ funding comes from grants made by foundations, governments and charities. From December 2005 to November 2006 approximately 58% of Global Witness’ income came in the form of grants from private trusts and foundations, 17% came from revenue from statutory sources such as the Dutch, Irish and Swedish governments. 13% came from grants from non governmental organisations and 12% came from donations made by individuals. Global Witness is not a membership organisation and thus does not spend large amounts of money on communicating with members or mailing out fundraising appeals and updates. Global Witness spends 8% of its funds on raising money, 1% on management and 1% on administrative costs.[9]

References

  1. ^ Global Witness, about us. http://www.globalwitness.org/pages/en/about_us.html
  2. ^ BG Group. http://www.bg-group.com/cr/media/EITI_BGBriefing_2004.pdf
  3. ^ Independent Forest Monitoring. http://www.globalwitness.org/pages/en/ifm.html
  4. ^ Gletisman Foundation International Honorees. http://www.gleitsman.org/intHonoree.html
  5. ^ Hilary Benn, Secretary of State for International Development, 5th White Paper speech, Chatham House/BOND ‘Development Beyond Aid’, 23 February 2006. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/Speeches/wp2006-speeches/beyond-aid230206.asp
  6. ^ Department For International Development. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20143509~menuPK:34463~pagePK:64003015~piPK:64003012~theSitePK:4607,00.html
  7. ^ The Economist, June 21st, 2007. http://economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9370232&CFID=11059150&CFTOKEN=60200750
  8. ^ Department of State. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_reports&docid=f:sr128.110.pdf
  9. ^ Annual Report 2006. www.globalwitness.org