Jump to content

Talk:Everest University: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fcoulter (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


All in all, this article badly needs revision.[[User:Fcoulter|Fredrik Coulter]] ([[User talk:Fcoulter|talk]]) 20:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
All in all, this article badly needs revision.[[User:Fcoulter|Fredrik Coulter]] ([[User talk:Fcoulter|talk]]) 20:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I attempted to make the article more Encyclopedic in tone, but it's a hard job. --[[Special:Contributions/99.250.177.248|99.250.177.248]] ([[User talk:99.250.177.248|talk]]) 01:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:19, 10 August 2009

"The good news" language sounds like a press release. In fact, most of this article doesn't seem encyclopedic in tone. Also, no mention is made in the accreditation debate section that the high prestige schools are regionally accredited, not nationally, and that some (if not most) regionally accredited schools don't accept graduation from a nationally accredited school as qualifications for entry into their graduate program. I know that regionally accredited schools don't accept credentials from nationally accredited schools for instructors. (If you want to teach in a regionally accredited college, you need to have a Masters Degree and 18 credits of graduate courses in the field you want to teach in.)

All in all, this article badly needs revision.Fredrik Coulter (talk) 20:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to make the article more Encyclopedic in tone, but it's a hard job. --99.250.177.248 (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]