Talk:Giselle Galos: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'Although C. Galos is definitely not an important classical composer, having two 'hit' songs that appear in several music books up to this day, does show that he is ...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think it is important to have this page because I could hardly find any other information on the composer and would like other people to add to the article. But without any starting point it is difficult to know more about the subject. |
I think it is important to have this page because I could hardly find any other information on the composer and would like other people to add to the article. But without any starting point it is difficult to know more about the subject. |
||
His songs belong to a [http://www.todocoleccion.net/c-galos-lago-como-nocturno-op-24-para-piano-editorial-musica-moderna~x8000552 collection of famous pieces for the piano]. Famous piece, therefore at least a mentionable composer I'd say. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 23:29, 11 August 2009
Although C. Galos is definitely not an important classical composer, having two 'hit' songs that appear in several music books up to this day, does show that he is worth mentioning. There are various other articles of lesser known composers on Wikipedia with only 1 broadly remembered song. As such, C. Galos deserves his place here too.
I think it is important to have this page because I could hardly find any other information on the composer and would like other people to add to the article. But without any starting point it is difficult to know more about the subject.
His songs belong to a collection of famous pieces for the piano. Famous piece, therefore at least a mentionable composer I'd say.