Talk:TuxGuitar: Difference between revisions
122589423KM (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Speedy deletion?: new section |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I just started this article because it was requested from a long time on the requested articles page, it will be remodelled from its barebones analysis hopefully soon. |
I just started this article because it was requested from a long time on the requested articles page, it will be remodelled from its barebones analysis hopefully soon. |
||
This program is Open source and quite well known, so it's not as if there is any risk of self promotion. It should stay because all the other guitar programs such as guitar pro and powertab have a page and they aren't even open source, meanwhile this program is quite mature (its not beta or anything), and on the spanish wikipedia they have an article on tuxguitar why shouldn't the english wikipedia have this article. |
This program is Open source and quite well known, so it's not as if there is any risk of self promotion. It should stay because all the other guitar programs such as guitar pro and powertab have a page and they aren't even open source, meanwhile this program is quite mature (its not beta or anything), and on the spanish wikipedia they have an article on tuxguitar why shouldn't the english wikipedia have this article. |
||
== Speedy deletion? == |
|||
I definitely don't think that this article should be deleted. Not only is the program a common FOSS alternative to Guitar Pro, but I don't see any reason why the article's existence lacks relevance. It is a very noteworthy program, and deserving of an article. [[User:Rondmc170|ronnycary]] ([[User talk:Rondmc170|talk]]) 02:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:28, 30 August 2009
Is anyone working on this?
Is anyone working on this page? I think I'd like to make a good article out of this. I'll get to work this week making this article make sense. I seem to remember a good article for TuxGuitar a few months ago, but perhaps it was deleted? ronnycary (talk) 13:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
I just started this article because it was requested from a long time on the requested articles page, it will be remodelled from its barebones analysis hopefully soon.
This program is Open source and quite well known, so it's not as if there is any risk of self promotion. It should stay because all the other guitar programs such as guitar pro and powertab have a page and they aren't even open source, meanwhile this program is quite mature (its not beta or anything), and on the spanish wikipedia they have an article on tuxguitar why shouldn't the english wikipedia have this article.
Speedy deletion?
I definitely don't think that this article should be deleted. Not only is the program a common FOSS alternative to Guitar Pro, but I don't see any reason why the article's existence lacks relevance. It is a very noteworthy program, and deserving of an article. ronnycary (talk) 02:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)