Jump to content

Talk:TuxGuitar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Rondmc170 (talk | contribs)
→‎Reviews/ratings: new section
Line 14: Line 14:


Oh, and I realize that this article was at one point deleted, but I'd like to see the criteria for that article's deletion. Being that versions of this article exist on non-English Wikipedias, I believe that it at least has that much relevance. [[User:Rondmc170|ronnycary]] ([[User talk:Rondmc170|talk]]) 02:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and I realize that this article was at one point deleted, but I'd like to see the criteria for that article's deletion. Being that versions of this article exist on non-English Wikipedias, I believe that it at least has that much relevance. [[User:Rondmc170|ronnycary]] ([[User talk:Rondmc170|talk]]) 02:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

== Reviews/ratings ==

I'd love to see more independent reviews of TuxGuitar. Does anybody know of any besides the CNET ratings? I'll admit, this is the first article I've really wanted to build up, so any help would be appreciated! [[User:Rondmc170|ronnycary]] ([[User talk:Rondmc170|talk]]) 16:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:15, 31 August 2009

Is anyone working on this?

Is anyone working on this page? I think I'd like to make a good article out of this. I'll get to work this week making this article make sense. I seem to remember a good article for TuxGuitar a few months ago, but perhaps it was deleted? ronnycary (talk) 13:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I just started this article because it was requested from a long time on the requested articles page, it will be remodelled from its barebones analysis hopefully soon. This program is Open source and quite well known, so it's not as if there is any risk of self promotion. It should stay because all the other guitar programs such as guitar pro and powertab have a page and they aren't even open source, meanwhile this program is quite mature (its not beta or anything), and on the spanish wikipedia they have an article on tuxguitar why shouldn't the english wikipedia have this article. the spanish wikipedia article for tuxguitar is http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/TuxGuitar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122589423KM (talkcontribs) 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion?

I definitely don't think that this article should be deleted. Not only is the program a common FOSS alternative to Guitar Pro, but I don't see any reason why the article's existence lacks relevance. It is a very noteworthy program, and deserving of an article. ronnycary (talk) 02:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I realize that this article was at one point deleted, but I'd like to see the criteria for that article's deletion. Being that versions of this article exist on non-English Wikipedias, I believe that it at least has that much relevance. ronnycary (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews/ratings

I'd love to see more independent reviews of TuxGuitar. Does anybody know of any besides the CNET ratings? I'll admit, this is the first article I've really wanted to build up, so any help would be appreciated! ronnycary (talk) 16:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]