User talk:Alan Isherwood

Archives (Index) 2009/August This page is archived by ClueBot III. Rollback I have Isherwood granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC) Awesome, thank you very much :) DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 14:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC) No problem. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 15:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1hourflex I swear you must be getting paid for allowing pages to be published or not, for you so quickly market the onehourpage for deletion that it really looked weird! In fact before marking the page for deletion why don´t you: 1 - READ the links that give it notability 2 - WAIT until it is at least finished! --User:Galonga 13:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Hi Galonga. My observations were based on a Google search for 1hourflex [1] which provided minimal search results. By all means, if you believe my actions are in error, then please provide your reasons on the article's talk page. As part of the speedy-deletion process, the speedy deletion tag should not be removed by the article author, instead, the hangon tag should be added. I noticed you added the hangon tag whilst removing the speedy deletion tag, this is a minor procedural error. I have gone ahead and replaced the deletion tag whilst keeping your hangon message. You should now provide your thoughts on the article's talk page. Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. Cheers, DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 13:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC) That´s why there are the links in the article: so please check them and you´ll see that those are leading publications in the field —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galonga (talk • contribs) 13:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Fair enough then, but as I said, you should be moving this conversation to the article's talk page. The final deletion decision is not made by me, it will be made by an administrator who will be expecting to see your comments there. As a side note, if you plan on expanding the article longer then it is now in the near future, you may wish to consider using the Template:Under_construction tag. DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 13:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Thank you. You could point out to the lectonar admin this conversation, for he just deleted the article giving me no time to put the tag you mentioned. Geez! You admins are too eager to pull the trigger! Wait at least a couple of hours to delete things!