Jump to content

User talk:116.71.169.91: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
Next edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
False statements at Imperial College London article.
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Imperial College London article - be careful with your editions==

This is the second time I revert an edition by you at the article [[Imperial College London]].
This is the second time I revert an edition by you at the article [[Imperial College London]].


I know you are probably a student at LSE, and probably what you want is that LSE looks better in other articles, right?
I know you are probably a student at LSE, and probably what you want is that LSE looks better in other articles, right?

Let's see if you are right. This is the article as it is now:


''Regularly placed in the top three in the Times National University League Table along with Oxford and Cambridge,[5] Imperial was placed 5th overall in the world in the 2007 THE - QS World University Rankings of universities worldwide,[6] and 27th in the world by the Shanghai Jiao Tong Academic Ranking of World Universities.[7]
''Regularly placed in the top three in the Times National University League Table along with Oxford and Cambridge,[5] Imperial was placed 5th overall in the world in the 2007 THE - QS World University Rankings of universities worldwide,[6] and 27th in the world by the Shanghai Jiao Tong Academic Ranking of World Universities.[7]


''
''

This is the article as you want it to be:

''Regularly placed in the top four in the Times National University League Table along with Oxford, Cambridge, and LSE,[5] Imperial was placed 5th overall in the world in the 2007 THE - QS World University Rankings of universities worldwide,[6] and 27th in the world by the Shanghai Jiao Tong Academic Ranking of World Universities.[7]''



As the correct article says, the Times National University League Table has always placed Imperial College in 3rd place, and even sometimes 2nd:
As the correct article says, the Times National University League Table has always placed Imperial College in 3rd place, and even sometimes 2nd:
Line 48: Line 57:


So, if you do not want to be blocked by Wikipedia, please, forget Imperial College London article.
So, if you do not want to be blocked by Wikipedia, please, forget Imperial College London article.

If your change had good intentions (I doubt it), please, if your edition is reverted, DON'T TRY AGAIN! You'll only get one thing: Being banned from wikipedia.


Thanks for your understanding.
Thanks for your understanding.

Revision as of 07:42, 12 September 2009

Imperial College London article - be careful with your editions

This is the second time I revert an edition by you at the article Imperial College London.

I know you are probably a student at LSE, and probably what you want is that LSE looks better in other articles, right?

Let's see if you are right. This is the article as it is now:

Regularly placed in the top three in the Times National University League Table along with Oxford and Cambridge,[5] Imperial was placed 5th overall in the world in the 2007 THE - QS World University Rankings of universities worldwide,[6] and 27th in the world by the Shanghai Jiao Tong Academic Ranking of World Universities.[7]

This is the article as you want it to be:

Regularly placed in the top four in the Times National University League Table along with Oxford, Cambridge, and LSE,[5] Imperial was placed 5th overall in the world in the 2007 THE - QS World University Rankings of universities worldwide,[6] and 27th in the world by the Shanghai Jiao Tong Academic Ranking of World Universities.[7]


As the correct article says, the Times National University League Table has always placed Imperial College in 3rd place, and even sometimes 2nd:

UK University Rankings
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Times Good University Guide 3rd[1] 3rd 3rd[2] 3rd[3] 3rd 3rd[4] 3rd 3rd[5][6] 3rd[7] 2nd 2nd[8] 2nd[9]

So, if you do not want to be blocked by Wikipedia, please, forget Imperial College London article.

If your change had good intentions (I doubt it), please, if your edition is reverted, DON'T TRY AGAIN! You'll only get one thing: Being banned from wikipedia.

Thanks for your understanding.

  1. ^ "The Times Good University Guide 2010". The Times. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  2. ^ "The Times Good University Guide 2008". The Times. Retrieved 2007-11-03.
  3. ^ "The Times Good University Guide 2007 - Top Universities 2007 League Table". The Times. Retrieved 2007-11-03.
  4. ^ "The Times Top Universities". The Times. Retrieved 2007-11-03.
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference FT 2002-war was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ "Times Good University Guide 2003 - Ignore the 2002 typo in the doucument" (PDF).
  7. ^ "The Times Good University Guide 2002 - The Times 2002 Good University Guide Overall Rankings" (PDF). The Times. Retrieved 2007-12-05.
  8. ^ "The Times Top Universities". The Times. Retrieved 2007-12-04.
  9. ^ "Thes Times 1999 League Table". The Times. Retrieved 2007-12-04.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:116.71.169.91&oldid=313331926"