Jump to content

Talk:Lunar mass: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HarryAlffa (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPMeasure|class=Stub|importance=Mid}}
{{WPMeasure|class=Stub|importance=Mid}}
{{WPSpace|astronomy=yes}}
{{WPMoon}}


== Who uses "lunar mass"? ==
== Who uses "lunar mass"? ==

Revision as of 06:12, 22 September 2009

WikiProject iconMeasurement Stub‑class (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:WPSpace

WikiProject iconAstronomy Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Who uses "lunar mass"?

I never heard of a scientist using the unit "lunar mass" to describe the mass of moons in the outer solar system. Could someone provide a reference before I put this up for deletion? Lunokhod 23:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

Wikipedia:Stub category applies to those articles with no more than "rudimentary" information.

While very short articles are likely to be stubs, there are some subjects about which there is very little that can be written.

This article is not a stub, there's just not much more that should be written, more could, but it would be "inflation" for the sake of it. If you really think it can never be more than a stub, then {{Copy to Wiktionary}}. HarryAlffa (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]