User talk:69.225.3.119

Your latest message

Your latest response at our bot approval brawl didn't go through or something. It's just your signature. Just letting you know. Abyssal (talk) 00:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

ANI notice

FYI, I started an ANI thread to determine whether your recent edits were appropriate or not. I did this because I am obviously not qualified to judge myself since I am directly involved. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you for a week for disruptive editing. Please take this time to reflect on your actions and refrain from making frivolous accusations and POINT violations upon your return. — Jake Wartenberg 03:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not stupid, and I saw this coming as soon as ThaddeusB put his "please SOMEONE do me a favor and block this IP so I can run my bot" notice on AN/I.

Hissy fitting, 13-year-old, passive-aggressive idiot signing off to make sure that administrators can name call all they want, --69.225.3.119 (talk) 04:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

PS It is nice to have the name calling, thoroughly, 100% confirmed and endorsed without the pesky little input of the other side, isn't it? --69.225.3.119 (talk) 04:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and ONE WEEK FOR FIRST OFFENSE WITHOUT ANY WARNING! That's impressive! --69.225.3.119 (talk) 04:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

So, Abyssal and ThaddeusB get me BLOCKED FOR A WEEK, then talk about me?

barnstars

contributions, hard work, to improve the quality of wikipedia's science articles, something I've been doing for years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=69.226.103.13&namespace=0&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1

Now I'm blocked for a week, at User:ThaddeusB's request so that he and User:Abyssal can say what they want about me, without my responding, something Abyssal is taking full advantage of, and get the bot through without having to address legitimate concerns:

1. the reason anybot created such a horrid mess was that the bot operator did not know the material his bot was adding and he had no one from the community who knew it and was willing to vet it: the same situation in play with contentCreationBot

This will not produce good science articles, good paleontology articles: shutting the experts up, so that those who admit to no expertise can add 10,000 pieces of unvetted data.

It is also likely that these data will generate unvetted content on wiki mirrors.

When I informed Abyssal that he had created an article with a misspelling, he simply ignored my post for months. This misinformation was transferred through cyber space in wiki mirrors.

Abyssal takes no responsibility for that.

And, now that ThaddeusB succeeded brilliantly in baiting me, including with a community-banned editor who's supposed to be on probabtion coming by to call me a 13-year-old.

The most disgusting thing is that ThaddeusB got me blocked for a week and now Abyssal and ThaddeusB act as if I can respond to what they have to say, so they can plow forward and get a bot flag for entering 10,000 pieces of unvetted data into tables on wikipedia.

--69.225.3.119 (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)