File talk:Majapahit Empire.svg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'Dear users, Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a referenc...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Can we write history without manipulation? |
Can we write history without manipulation? |
||
I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda. |
I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also [[Kidung Sunda]] article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda. |
||
Best regards, |
Best regards, |
||
Latest revision as of 04:54, 29 September 2009
Dear users,
Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda.
Best regards, --Serayu 04:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation)
