Talk:Office of Management and Budget: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:35, 2 October 2009

Peter Orszag could not have been "appointed" on 15th December 2008 both because President Obama was not president than, and wasn't yet confirmed by the senate. He technically couldn't have even been nominated at that date, as nomination is an official term which would require presidential action. The line should read that the President-elected announced he would nominate Peter Orszag on 15th December 2008, or that he was selected on that date for nomination.

Does anyone have a citation for the "over 600 employees" reference? I believe "approximately 500" would be more accurate. I'll search for a reference on that. - Walkiped 17:45, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Found it. Director Bolten's Congressional testimony of March 24, 2004. - Walkiped 18:04, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{USGOV}}
+Peter Orszag could not have been "appointed" on 15th December 2008 both because President Obama was not president than, and wasn't yet confirmed by the senate. He technically couldn't have even been nominated at that date, as nomination is an official term which would require presidential action. The line should read that the President-elected announced he would nominate Peter Orszag on 15th December 2008, or that he was selected on that date for nomination.
 Does anyone have a citation for the "over 600 employees" reference? I believe "approximately 500" would be more accurate. I'll search for a reference on that. - [[User:Walkiped|Walkiped]] 17:45, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)