Jump to content

Anyon: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: Line 3:


==From theory to reality==
==From theory to reality==
A group of [[Theoretical physics|theoretical physicists]] working at the [[University of Oslo]] and lead by Jon Leinaas and Jan Myrheim, calculated in 1977 that the traditional division between fermions and bosons would not apply to theoretical particles existing in two-[[dimension]]s.<ref name=WilczekJan2006>[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/23894 From electronics to anyonics], [[Frank Wilczek]], Physics World, January 2006, ISSN: 0953-8585 </ref> Such particles would be expected to exhibit a diverse range of previously unexpected properties. They were given the name Anyons by [[Frank Wilczek]] in 1982.<ref>[http://www.sciencewatch.com/interviews/frank_wilczek1.htm Frank Wilczek on Anyons and their Role in Superconductivity]</ref> The associated mathematics proved to be useful to [[Bertrand Halperin]] at [[Harvard University]] in explaining aspects of the fractional [[quantum Hall effect]]. [[Frank Wilczek]], Dan Arovas, and [[Robert Schrieffer]] verified this statement in 1985 with an explicit calculation.
A group of [[Theoretical physics|theoretical physicists]] working at the [[University of Oslo]] and lead by Jon Leinaas and Jan Myrheim, calculated in 1977 that the traditional division between fermions and bosons would not apply to theoretical particles existing in two-[[dimension]]s.<ref name=WilczekJan2006>[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/23894 From electronics to anyonics], [[Frank Wilczek]], Physics World, January 2006, ISSN: 0953-8585 </ref> Such particles would be expected to exhibit a diverse range of previously unexpected properties. They were given the name Anyons by [[Frank Wilczek]] in 1982.<ref>[http://www.sciencewatch.com/interviews/frank_wilczek1.htm Frank Wilczek on Anyons and their Role in Superconductivity]</ref> The associated mathematics proved to be useful to [[Bertrand Halperin]] at [[Harvard University]] in explaining aspects of the [[fractional quantum Hall effect]]. [[Frank Wilczek]], Dan Arovas, and [[Robert Schrieffer]] verified this statement in 1985 with an explicit calculation.





Revision as of 09:38, 11 October 2009

Template:Statistics (stat. mech.) In mathematics and physics, an anyon is a type of particle that occurs only in two-dimensional systems. It is a generalization of the fermion and boson concept.

From theory to reality

A group of theoretical physicists working at the University of Oslo and lead by Jon Leinaas and Jan Myrheim, calculated in 1977 that the traditional division between fermions and bosons would not apply to theoretical particles existing in two-dimensions.[1] Such particles would be expected to exhibit a diverse range of previously unexpected properties. They were given the name Anyons by Frank Wilczek in 1982.[2] The associated mathematics proved to be useful to Bertrand Halperin at Harvard University in explaining aspects of the fractional quantum Hall effect. Frank Wilczek, Dan Arovas, and Robert Schrieffer verified this statement in 1985 with an explicit calculation.


In 2005 a group of physicists at Stony Brook University constructed a quasiparticle interferometer, detecting the patterns cause by interference of Anyons which, somewhat controversially, indicated that Anyons are real, rather than just a mathematical construct.[3]

With developments in semiconductor technology meaning that the deposition of thin two-dimensional layers is possible - for example in sheets of graphene - the long term potential to use the properties of Anyons in electronics is being explored.

In physics

In space of three or more dimensions, particles are restricted to being fermions or bosons, according to their statistical behaviour. Fermions respect the so-called Fermi-Dirac statistics while bosons respect the Bose-Einstein statistics. In the language of quantum physics this is formulated as the behavior of multiparticle states under the exchange of particles. This is in particular for a two-particle state (in Dirac notation):

(where the first entry in is the state of particle 1 and the second entry is the state of particle 2. So for example the left hand side is read as "Particle 1 is in state and particle 2 in state "). Here the "+" corresponds to both particles being bosons and the "−" to both particles being fermions (composite states of fermions and bosons are irrelevant since that would make them distinguishable).

In two-dimensional systems, however, quasiparticles can be observed which obey statistics ranging continuously between Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics, as was first shown by Jon Magne Leinaas and Jan Myrheim of the University of Oslo in 1977[4]. In our above example of two particles this looks as follows:

With "i" being the imaginary unit from the calculus of complex numbers and a real number. Recall that and as well as . So in the case we recover the Fermi-Dirac statistics (minus sign) and in the case the Bose-Einstein statistics (plus sign). In between we have something different. Frank Wilczek coined the term "anyon"[5] to describe such particles, since they can have any phase when particles are interchanged.

We also may use with particle spin quantum number s – s is integer for bosons, half integer for fermions, so that

  or   .

Topological basis

In more than two dimensions, the spin-statistics connection states that any multiparticle state has to obey either Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac statistics. This is related to the first homotopy group of SO(n,1) (and also Poincaré(n,1)) with , which is (the cyclic group consisting of two elements). Therefore only two possibilities remain. (The details are more involved than that, but this is the crucial point.)

The situation changes in two dimensions. Here the first homotopy group of SO(2,1) (and also Poincaré(2,1)) is Z (infinite cyclic). This means that Spin(2,1) is not the universal cover: it is not simply connected. In detail, there are projective representations of the special orthogonal group SO(2,1) which do not arise from linear representations of SO(2,1), or of its double cover, the spin group Spin(2,1). These representations are called anyons.

This concept also applies to nonrelativistic systems. The relevant part here is that the spatial rotation group is SO(2), which has an infinite first homotopy group.

This fact is also related to the braid groups well known in knot theory. The relation can be understood when one considers the fact that in two dimensions the group of permutations of two particles is no longer the symmetric group (with two elements) but rather the braid group (with an infinite number of elements).

A very different approach to the stability-decoherence problem in quantum computing is to create a topological quantum computer with anyons, quasi-particles used as threads and relying on braid theory to form stable logic gates.[6] [7]

References

  1. ^ From electronics to anyonics, Frank Wilczek, Physics World, January 2006, ISSN: 0953-8585
  2. ^ Frank Wilczek on Anyons and their Role in Superconductivity
  3. ^ Realization of a Laughlin quasiparticle interferometer: Observation of fractional statistics Physical Review, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075342 (2005)
  4. ^ Leinaas, J.M. (1977-01-11). "On the theory of identical particles". Il Nuovo Cimento B. 37 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1007/BF02727953. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Wilczek, Frank (1982-10-04). "Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles". Physical Review Letters. 49 (14): 957–959. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.957. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ Freedman, Michael (2002-10-20). "Topological Quantum Computation". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 40 (1): 31–38. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00964-3. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ Monroe, Don, Anyons: The breakthrough quantum computing needs?, New Scientist, 1 October 2008

See also

Further reading