User talk:Johann Wolfgang: Difference between revisions
sorry!!! |
thanks |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
sorry! the only reason i was deleting the information about the Rabbi Zalmen Leib and Rabbi Aharon conflict on the Satmar page was because I found the information to be biased and offensively written. plus, there is no clear source and opinions should not be expressed. is it absolutely necessary to write information about the conflict which is not confirmed true? |
sorry! the only reason i was deleting the information about the Rabbi Zalmen Leib and Rabbi Aharon conflict on the Satmar page was because I found the information to be biased and offensively written. plus, there is no clear source and opinions should not be expressed. is it absolutely necessary to write information about the conflict which is not confirmed true? |
||
thanks! |
thanks! |
||
== thanks == |
|||
hey thanks. i just find that information posted about the conflict unbased and extrememly slanderous and biased. it is not necessary to include it in an encyclopedic defintion of Satmar. thanks again. |
|||
Revision as of 03:24, 20 December 2005
Archive 1 - June 25th 2005 to November 14th 2005
| |
Bophuthatswana Postal Order articles.
Johann, these articles are dealing with 2 slightly different subjects. The first article is dealing with the postal orders issued by Bophuthatswana itself, & the second article is dealing with the remainder issue postal orders issued after Bophuthatswana's reincorporation into South Africa in April 1994. The same situation applies to the postal orders of Ciskei, Transkei, & Venda. - (Aidan Work 00:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC))
ok
I am not vandalizing anything, just editing what I see as biased information on Wilber. bye.
sorry!!!
sorry! the only reason i was deleting the information about the Rabbi Zalmen Leib and Rabbi Aharon conflict on the Satmar page was because I found the information to be biased and offensively written. plus, there is no clear source and opinions should not be expressed. is it absolutely necessary to write information about the conflict which is not confirmed true? thanks!
thanks
hey thanks. i just find that information posted about the conflict unbased and extrememly slanderous and biased. it is not necessary to include it in an encyclopedic defintion of Satmar. thanks again.