User talk:StJohnTheBaptist: Difference between revisions
→RE:Is Gaumata Smerdis or not: new section |
→Revert vandalism: new section |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Hi, 0. NO, Gaumata is not Smerdis. At least not according to most sources. The debates are 01: what was the real story of that killing. 02. who was Gaumata (and not Bardia). 1. That theory, you mention, is not "alternative". 2. Do not get angry with "hypothetical", because it is. 3. Wikipedia has rules (please see the answer at [[Talk:Darius_I_of_Persia#Ascension|talk page]] (specially "POV" policy, yes wikipedia pushes some POV!) 4. I will write an article on that story very soon and my account will include your favorite version, but I will use better sources, if you do not mind. The book you read is good to read but is not really appropriate for Encyclopaedia. 5. Please give me time, I will write that article. [[User:Xashaiar|Xashaiar]] ([[User talk:Xashaiar|talk]]) 07:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, 0. NO, Gaumata is not Smerdis. At least not according to most sources. The debates are 01: what was the real story of that killing. 02. who was Gaumata (and not Bardia). 1. That theory, you mention, is not "alternative". 2. Do not get angry with "hypothetical", because it is. 3. Wikipedia has rules (please see the answer at [[Talk:Darius_I_of_Persia#Ascension|talk page]] (specially "POV" policy, yes wikipedia pushes some POV!) 4. I will write an article on that story very soon and my account will include your favorite version, but I will use better sources, if you do not mind. The book you read is good to read but is not really appropriate for Encyclopaedia. 5. Please give me time, I will write that article. [[User:Xashaiar|Xashaiar]] ([[User talk:Xashaiar|talk]]) 07:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Revert vandalism == |
|||
Please do NOT accuse me or any other editor of vandalism when it is not, as in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeremy_Clarkson&diff=next&oldid=316765895 this example]. If you do not understand what isn't vandalism, then I suggest you read [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism this useful article] paying particular attention to the item in the table starting "Reversion or removal of unencyclopedic material..." Thank you. [[User:ajkgordon|<span style="background:#f3f3f3;border:1px solid #dedee6;color:#930007"><small>AJKGORDON</small></span>]][[User talk:ajkgordon|<span style="background:#dedee6;color:#363636;border:1px solid #dedee6">'''«»'''</span>]] 10:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:45, 20 October 2009
Before writing here, please, remember that you soul may burn in hell for eternity because of you wrote. StJohnTheBaptist (talk)
RE:Is Gaumata Smerdis or not
[edit]Hi, 0. NO, Gaumata is not Smerdis. At least not according to most sources. The debates are 01: what was the real story of that killing. 02. who was Gaumata (and not Bardia). 1. That theory, you mention, is not "alternative". 2. Do not get angry with "hypothetical", because it is. 3. Wikipedia has rules (please see the answer at talk page (specially "POV" policy, yes wikipedia pushes some POV!) 4. I will write an article on that story very soon and my account will include your favorite version, but I will use better sources, if you do not mind. The book you read is good to read but is not really appropriate for Encyclopaedia. 5. Please give me time, I will write that article. Xashaiar (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Revert vandalism
[edit]Please do NOT accuse me or any other editor of vandalism when it is not, as in this example. If you do not understand what isn't vandalism, then I suggest you read this useful article paying particular attention to the item in the table starting "Reversion or removal of unencyclopedic material..." Thank you. AJKGORDON«» 10:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)