User talk:Shell Kinney: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:21, 20 December 2005

Archives: Archive 1

I hereby award Jareth a barnstar for her extensive work fixing bracket problems listed at the Wiki Syntax Project.
Nickj (t) 02:45, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Block

Hi Jareth, just saw your 3rr block on Yuber. The user who was reverting against him was the sockpuppet of a user who was blocked recently for a 3rr, user:Mistress Selina Kyle and they are both likely sockpuppets of a banned user. Can you unblock until sockcheck is complete? Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jareth. Can you watch the Islamophobia page, the reverting user has returned. Please revert edits and protect if possible. Thanks.--a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I meant, are a revert of edits by a likely sockpuppet possible because of conditions that they are violating 3rr? --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR dispute: User:Huaiwei

While I appreciate the need for evenhandedness in handling disputes, I would have thought that my responding to user:Huaiwei's violation by reporting it in accordance with guidelines, and limiting my subsequent edits to relevant talk pages, should be sufficient to demonstrate my intention to comply with the applicable policy. Given his sanctioning by arbcom barely two weeks ago for similar behavior in another area, I don't think your response is appropriate. user:Huaiwei has taken a garden-variety verifiability question and, without provocation, turned it into a full-blown, personalized dispute, and is edit warring to preserve a set of unsourced, moderately dubious claims. He has conspicuously violated applicable civility and personal attack policies and guidelines. He denies an overt, intentional 3RR violation. It is, I believe, irresponsible to tacitly encourage him to continue in such behavior, as your response has done. Monicasdude 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Sorry I meant, are a revert of edits by a likely sockpuppet possible because of conditions that they are violating 3rr? --[[user:Anonymous editor|<font color="green">'''a.n.o.n.y.m'''</font>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]</sup> 21:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
+== 3RR dispute: User:Huaiwei ==
+::::While I appreciate the need for evenhandedness in handling disputes, I would have thought that my responding to [[user:Huaiwei]]'s violation by reporting it in accordance with guidelines, and limiting my subsequent edits to relevant talk pages, should be sufficient to demonstrate my intention to comply with the applicable policy. Given his sanctioning by arbcom barely two weeks ago for similar behavior in another area, I don't think your response is appropriate. [[user:Huaiwei]] has taken a garden-variety verifiability question and, without provocation, turned it into a full-blown, personalized dispute, and is edit warring to preserve a set of unsourced, moderately dubious claims.  He has conspicuously violated applicable civility and personal attack policies and guidelines. He denies an overt, intentional 3RR violation. It is, I believe, irresponsible to tacitly encourage him to continue in such behavior, as your response has done.  [[User:Monicasdude|Monicasdude]] 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)