Talk:Viola profonda: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{quote|Indeed, the purpose of an encyclopedia is to collect knowledge disseminated around the globe; to set forth its general system to the men with whom we live, and transmit it to those who will come after us, so that the work of preceding centuries will not become useless to the centuries to come.- <ref>Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=did;cc=did;idno=did2222.0000.004;rgn=main;view=text ''Encyclopédie.''] University of Michigan Library:Scholarly Publishing Office and DLXS. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007</ref>| [[Denis Diderot|Diderot]]}} |
{{quote|Indeed, the purpose of an encyclopedia is to collect knowledge disseminated around the globe; to set forth its general system to the men with whom we live, and transmit it to those who will come after us, so that the work of preceding centuries will not become useless to the centuries to come.- <ref>Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=did;cc=did;idno=did2222.0000.004;rgn=main;view=text ''Encyclopédie.''] University of Michigan Library:Scholarly Publishing Office and DLXS. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007</ref>| [[Denis Diderot|Diderot]]}} |
||
Why should Viola Profonda not be notable? Just because it has not as many hits as [[Air Jordan]] '''yet''' when locking for it in a search engine? |
Why should Viola Profonda not be notable? Just because it has not as many hits as [[Air Jordan]] '''yet''' when locking for it in a search engine? |
||
Brgds |
|||
Brgds ([[User:Pro.tone|Pro.tone]] ([[User talk:Pro.tone|talk]]) 19:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)) |
|||
Revision as of 19:11, 25 October 2009
The idea of a tenor-range string instrument is relevant and notable as you can appreciate at:
So it achieves to be categorized in the categories music theory and it’s verified existance [1] in bowed string instruments. Neither is the reader of the article being guided to buy anything nor does the article aim to sell the described object; so it’s not spam. Moreover it was also already accepted in other-languages Wikipedia-pages.
Indeed, the purpose of an encyclopedia is to collect knowledge disseminated around the globe; to set forth its general system to the men with whom we live, and transmit it to those who will come after us, so that the work of preceding centuries will not become useless to the centuries to come.- [2]
— Diderot
Why should Viola Profonda not be notable? Just because it has not as many hits as Air Jordan yet when locking for it in a search engine?
Brgds (Pro.tone (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC))
- ^ [1]
- ^ Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert Encyclopédie. University of Michigan Library:Scholarly Publishing Office and DLXS. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007