User talk:MatLocke: Difference between revisions
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: And just to add, please read [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:NOR]], and in particular, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS#Extremist_and_fringe_sources| WR:RS Extremist and fringe sources], thanks -- [[User:Historyguy1965|Historyguy1965]] ([[User talk:Historyguy1965|talk]]) 03:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
:: And just to add, please read [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:NOR]], and in particular, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS#Extremist_and_fringe_sources| WR:RS Extremist and fringe sources], thanks -- [[User:Historyguy1965|Historyguy1965]] ([[User talk:Historyguy1965|talk]]) 03:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
My apologies. I realize you are correct- I should bring them up on the discussion page first. I will do that now, and with future edits. I do see your point on how some of my edits do address homosexuality more directly than same-sex marriage, but at the same time- some directly relates- and all of it is pertinent to the topic, as the effects of homosexuality are one of the main concerns with allowing same-sex marriage. ([[User:MatLocke|MatLocke]] ([[User talk:MatLocke#top|talk]]) 03:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)) |
My apologies. I realize you are correct- I should bring them up on the discussion page first. I will do that now, and with future edits. I do see your point on how some of my edits do address homosexuality more directly than same-sex marriage, but at the same time- some directly relates- and all of it is pertinent to the topic, as the effects of homosexuality are one of the main concerns with allowing same-sex marriage. Also, I have read those articles already. You need not worry that I am violating any of those ideals as far as I am aware. ([[User:MatLocke|MatLocke]] ([[User talk:MatLocke#top|talk]]) 03:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)) |
||
Revision as of 03:42, 28 October 2009
Same Sex Marriage
You ought to take such sweeping changes to the discussion page first. The purpose of the article is not to debate homosexuality, but to discuss same sex marriage. Czolgolz (talk) 03:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- And just to add, please read WP:RS and WP:NOR, and in particular, WR:RS Extremist and fringe sources, thanks -- Historyguy1965 (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
My apologies. I realize you are correct- I should bring them up on the discussion page first. I will do that now, and with future edits. I do see your point on how some of my edits do address homosexuality more directly than same-sex marriage, but at the same time- some directly relates- and all of it is pertinent to the topic, as the effects of homosexuality are one of the main concerns with allowing same-sex marriage. Also, I have read those articles already. You need not worry that I am violating any of those ideals as far as I am aware. (MatLocke (talk) 03:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC))