Jump to content

Talk:Pissant: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


[[User: Loretta_Modern]] deleted a substantial amount of well-sourced material in this edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pissant&diff=281839887&oldid=281821050], giving the only explanation that it was "cruft". I disagree. Also, I think the of the word "cruft" is potentially dismissive, and seems to violate [[WP:Assume Good Faith]]. On these grounds I have restored all this material. I would appreciate some sincere dialogue before anyone attempts to remove this material. Thanks. [[User:Cazort|Cazort]] ([[User talk:Cazort|talk]]) 17:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
[[User: Loretta_Modern]] deleted a substantial amount of well-sourced material in this edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pissant&diff=281839887&oldid=281821050], giving the only explanation that it was "cruft". I disagree. Also, I think the of the word "cruft" is potentially dismissive, and seems to violate [[WP:Assume Good Faith]]. On these grounds I have restored all this material. I would appreciate some sincere dialogue before anyone attempts to remove this material. Thanks. [[User:Cazort|Cazort]] ([[User talk:Cazort|talk]]) 17:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

The term has been used in Southeast Pennsylvania for at least the last 70 years to denote a small red or orange ant which has a very strong smell. I do not know anything more about these ants but that was why I went to Wikipedia to look up this term. It would be nice if someone with knowledge of these ants could comment on them.

Revision as of 11:57, 5 November 2009

I'm looking for a good reference about wood ants being pissants. There's not much doubt about the fact that they are one and the same, but the references in the article aren't very scholarly. Lou Sander 01:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it difficult to believe that Vonnegut originated the usage of pissant when referring to a person. A cite, such as a dictionary, would be nice.

Spope3 (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)SteveP[reply]

This is hilarious. - Gamerunknown. >_> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.142.41.159 (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide United

The use of a naughty word by a football coach doesn't seem to be notable enough to put into an encyclopedia article. Unless somebody can provide some justification, I'm planning to remove it. Lou Sander (talk) 13:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He called the entire city of adelaide a pissant town. What kind of justification are you looking for exactly? Portillo (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some reason why this guy's utterance is notable, or why he, himself, is notable. He seems to be a pretty minor figure, and his remarks seem to be about a pretty minor thing. Lou Sander (talk) 23:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought you meant it needed a better citation or reference. I wouldnt describe it as a pretty minor thing. He insulted an entire city. Portillo (talk) 06:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think this comment does deserve mention in this article: the outburst was very notable in Australia and got nation wide coverage. The term in Australia is now directly linked to Adelaide due to Vidmar's comments. However, I would agree that this should be explained more in the article rather than just an offhand comment that Vidmar made a remark using the word "pissant". Mikhael04 (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good thinking, Mikhael104! As it stands in the article, (no offense intended to Australians), it's just some pissant football coach using a crude word. But if the reaction was as you said, it's surely a lot more than that. Somebody (you?) needs to find some citations and explain the situation as you did above. Lou Sander (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done and done. There was a famous "Adelaide Pissants" shirt being sold on eBay, in the style of the Adelaide United shirt, that I wanted to try and get a link too, but sadly the shirt has disappeared off the site. Still, I hope my little edit is enough to explain the situation a bit more. Mikhael04 (talk) 03:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this is minor. It is a thing that should not be said but was wisely apologised for. The FFA dont think it is minor and all australian football (soccer) supporters wouldn't either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.38.253 (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too many examples

We can't degrade this article by including stories about every use of "piss ant." The Adelaide one is fine because it got some notable publicity. I propose to delete the other recent ones, unless somebody can justify keeping them. Lou Sander (talk) 03:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

restoring deleted material

User: Loretta_Modern deleted a substantial amount of well-sourced material in this edit: [1], giving the only explanation that it was "cruft". I disagree. Also, I think the of the word "cruft" is potentially dismissive, and seems to violate WP:Assume Good Faith. On these grounds I have restored all this material. I would appreciate some sincere dialogue before anyone attempts to remove this material. Thanks. Cazort (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term has been used in Southeast Pennsylvania for at least the last 70 years to denote a small red or orange ant which has a very strong smell. I do not know anything more about these ants but that was why I went to Wikipedia to look up this term. It would be nice if someone with knowledge of these ants could comment on them.