Jump to content

The three Rs: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Wolfkeeper (talk | contribs)
are not a term for (WP:NAD)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Weasel|article|date=September 2008}}
{{Weasel|article|date=September 2008}}


'''The three Rs''' (as in the letter ''R'') is a phrase sometimes used<ref>[http://www.papert.org/articles/ObsoleteSkillSet.html Obsolete Skill Set: The 3 Rs — Literacy and Letteracy in the Media Ages]</ref> to describe the foundations of a [[basic skills]] oriented education program within schools: '''reading, writing and 'rithmetic'''. The phrase is attributed to a toast given by Sir W. Curtis around 1825.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=tBc4AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA75&dq=%22reading,+writing+and+%27rithmetic%22&lr=&as_drrb_is=b&as_minm_is=1&as_miny_is=1000&as_maxm_is=1&as_maxy_is=1850&as_brr=4&ei=IbHzSqLMKZXokATMprHKBQ#v=onepage&q=%22reading%2C%20writing%20and%20%27rithmetic%22&f=false The Mirror of Literature Amusement and Instruction, Volume 5] by By John Timbs, J. Limbird, 1825</ref> Since its original creation, many others have created new words for what the R's stand for.
'''The three Rs''' (as in the letter ''R'') are<ref>[http://www.papert.org/articles/ObsoleteSkillSet.html Obsolete Skill Set: The 3 Rs — Literacy and Letteracy in the Media Ages]</ref> the foundations of a [[basic skills]] oriented education program within schools: '''reading, writing and 'rithmetic'''. The phrase is attributed to a toast given by Sir W. Curtis around 1825.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=tBc4AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA75&dq=%22reading,+writing+and+%27rithmetic%22&lr=&as_drrb_is=b&as_minm_is=1&as_miny_is=1000&as_maxm_is=1&as_maxy_is=1850&as_brr=4&ei=IbHzSqLMKZXokATMprHKBQ#v=onepage&q=%22reading%2C%20writing%20and%20%27rithmetic%22&f=false The Mirror of Literature Amusement and Instruction, Volume 5] by By John Timbs, J. Limbird, 1825</ref> Since its original creation, many others have created new words for what the R's stand for.


==Etymology==
==Etymology==

Revision as of 14:46, 13 November 2009

The three Rs (as in the letter R) are[1] the foundations of a basic skills oriented education program within schools: reading, writing and 'rithmetic. The phrase is attributed to a toast given by Sir W. Curtis around 1825.[2] Since its original creation, many others have created new words for what the R's stand for.

Etymology

The phrase 'the three Rs' is used because each word in the phrase has a strong R phoneme (sound) at the beginning. The term is ironic, since someone with a firm education in the subjects would know that two of the words do not actually begin with an R. The three Rs could also refer to Reduce, Reuse, Recycle or Read, Write, Recite.

The Three Rs in the United States

The three Rs are often seen as dated and obsolete in an age of standards based education reform.[citation needed] Mathematics is about writing, statistics, charts and communication. Increased emphasis is made on science, social studies, and physical education. Yet in the debate about education reform, many prefer [who?] the traditional, simpler approach of the three Rs to authentic assessment, rubrics and learning outcomes.

Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction., Terry Bergeson, has identified the new 3 Rs from Robert Carkhuff's 3 Rs as Relating, Representing and Reasoning.[3] Carkhuff was a self-published consultant paid $1 million to provide materials to help design Washington State's controversial standards based education reform program. Terry Bergeson has pledged that that all would receive world class standards diplomas, yet one half of all students and three-quarters of minority students are on track to have their diplomas revoked in 2008 because they do not pass the new 3 Rs standard set by the WASL standards based assessment. While over half of US students will be required to pass similar High school graduation examinations, because of objections from parents and education experts, no more states have adopted such requirements and some have dropped them in 2006. Advocates of the traditional education question how students who struggle with basic skills can be expected to be more successful at higher developmental higher order thinking levels. States like California abandoned similar standards in the late 1990s in favor of returning to basic skills.

See also

Notes