Talk:Political media: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Willy turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Undid revision 311575378 by Willy turner (talk) All very well .. you are reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Politics|class=Stub|importance=mid}} |
|||
:By the way, the [[:internet|internet]] is a medium I put high hopes into, else I wouldn´t write this. <font size=-1>But the internet is prone to sabotage, because most data flows through a few knots, so if you bomb down, hack or compromise a few of them you can affect 95% of the world´s available data bandwidth, still 80% after a few days of reconfiguration. The state cares for roads to walk, ride and drive on, it should care for the internet, too.</font> |
:By the way, the [[:internet|internet]] is a medium I put high hopes into, else I wouldn´t write this. <font size=-1>But the internet is prone to sabotage, because most data flows through a few knots, so if you bomb down, hack or compromise a few of them you can affect 95% of the world´s available data bandwidth, still 80% after a few days of reconfiguration. The state cares for roads to walk, ride and drive on, it should care for the internet, too.</font> |
||
Revision as of 13:43, 24 November 2009
- By the way, the internet is a medium I put high hopes into, else I wouldn´t write this. But the internet is prone to sabotage, because most data flows through a few knots, so if you bomb down, hack or compromise a few of them you can affect 95% of the world´s available data bandwidth, still 80% after a few days of reconfiguration. The state cares for roads to walk, ride and drive on, it should care for the internet, too.
This is exaggeration. Most of bandwidth goes inside countries, not to US and from US, as author seems to think. To destroy 95% of data bandwidth you would have to sabotage many thousands (if not more) of data lines. --Taw
- Nearly all american traffic flows over a few knots in NY; London & Paris for Europeean traffic. The "need" to cut costs has lead to a very concentrated picture, the old picture of the decentral ARPAnet is not valid anymore. Grasso
This article should be called "Propaganda organs" and possibly included in the progaganda article. It needs shortening and/or NPOVing. Ed Poor
Who is the author(s)?