User talk:Nburden: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:03, 7 December 2009

EMU

I created a seperate article for a MINOR controversy which hasn't been reported on since the killer was convicted almost two years ago. I think you need to read the vandalism policy before you attempt to claim someone is committing vandalism again. Particularly, what vandalism is: "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a delberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. It is clear you didn't actually review my edits, otherwise you would have seen that I moved the information to its own article. It wasn't randomly deleted. It is simply such a MINOR issue it does not need a half-dozen paragraphs on the university page. In the future, please do not place warnings on people's pages regarding edits without actually reviewing what they did. Thank you. CraigMonroe (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This all would have been perfectly clear if you had used an edit summary, or the talk page. How is anyone supposed to know that you created a new article while looking at a diff with no summary, and a talk page with nothing addressing the split? As is, I thought you were just blanking the section, which would neatly fit the definition of vandalism. I'll admit that I didn't scour your contribs if you'll admit that an edit summary would have helped. Nburden ^(T) 04:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean an edit summary such as "created new page?" Maybe you should look at the edits again, as I said that in the first of my edit. So you are aware, all I am saying is you should take a good look at a person's edits before you assume they are vandalising anything. Thank you for removing the warning from my page. CraigMonroe (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please block the ip

hi, i noticed that you gave an ip a final warning for vandalism. please note this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riverwood_High_School&diff=prev&oldid=329721361 where the word "penis" was spelled out by this person who is obviously a high school student. Brendan19 (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin. You should report the IP at WP:AIV. Nburden ^(T) 22:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:58, 7 December 2009 edit Brendan19 (talk \| contribs) 670 edits →please block the ip: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:03, 7 December 2009 edit undo Nburden (talk \| contribs) 5,312 edits →please block the ip: Response. Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	hi, i noticed that you gave an ip a final warning for vandalism. please note this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riverwood_High_School&diff=prev&oldid=329721361 where the word "penis" was spelled out by this person who is obviously a high school student. [[User:Brendan19\|Brendan19]] ([[User talk:Brendan19\|talk]]) 21:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)		hi, i noticed that you gave an ip a final warning for vandalism. please note this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riverwood_High_School&diff=prev&oldid=329721361 where the word "penis" was spelled out by this person who is obviously a high school student. [[User:Brendan19\|Brendan19]] ([[User talk:Brendan19\|talk]]) 21:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
			:I'm not an admin. You should report the IP at [[WP:AIV]]. [[User:Nburden\|<span style="color:#800">N<span style="color:#a00">b<span style="color:#b00">u'''<span style="color:#c00">r</span>d'''</span>'''e'''</span>'''n'''</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:Nburden\|(T)]]</font></sup> 22:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)