Jump to content

User talk:The Arbiter: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:The Arbiter/Archives/December 2009. (BOT)
Line 100: Line 100:


'''Thank you''' very much for the barnstar! <span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 00:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
'''Thank you''' very much for the barnstar! <span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 00:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

== Much delayed barnstar ==

{| style="border: 5px solid #8000FF; background-color: #FFFAF0;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Rescuebarnstar.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Article Rescue Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 3px solid gray;" | For the work and major cleanup, and thereby saving [[Windows Police Pro]] [[User:BlueVista|BlueVista]] ([[User talk:BlueVista|talk]]) 15:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 15:16, 15 December 2009



User:The Arbiter User talk:Example User:Example/Current_favorit_subjects User:The Arbiter/To-do Wikipedia:Awards User:The Arbiter/Guestbook User:Example/Contributions
Home
Talk
USERBOXES!
To-do
My Awards
Guestbook
My Contribs



Please sign my GUESTBOOK!!!!


Looking for a message but can't find it? Search the archives!



What does the status mean?
Online - I am working on Wikipedia, and will answer promptly.
Offline - I am not on Wikipedia, my computer is off, so don't expect a quick reply.
Busy - I am on my computer, maybe even online, but doing something else. Responses may be delayed but should come soon.
Away - I am not even home! A response from me will most likely not come for a few days.
Wikibreak - I have decided to take a break. Urgent matters would be better directed somewhere else.


vn-1This user talk page has been vandalized 1 time.






Re: Morgan Newton

He might be notable, not sure. It was deleted due to it being a copyright violation, so the question of notability wasn't brought up. Wizardman 01:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the page I deleted was copied word for word from the kentucky team site. Wizardman 17:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a question to ask the people at Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group. I don't know enough about bots to know if they'd approve it, though I think they'd be fine with it imo. Wizardman 17:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{{Helpme}} I am interested in beginning to develop a bot. Is there a page that shows the current active bots and a brief summary of their functions? I just want to make sure that I don't make a redundant bot, if you get my meaning. The Arbiter 22:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Bots/Status @Kate (parlez) 22:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


ADoptee

no hard feelings. some things have gotten in the way and i thought it was best to find another one. someone accuses me of targetting him and is using you as an excuse even though i have not mentioned his name.

so i thought it's best if i found another adoptee so this user wont accuse me of ganging up on him.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm the one Bread Ninja is talking about, I'd like to clarify a few things. Being one of the participants in the debate which ended in a consensus against one of Bread Ninja's proposition, I was not too pleased to see that Bread Ninja was using your talk page, The Arbiter, to spread behind our backs her own, very subjective account of the debate, in which we would all have been "uncivil".
I didn't say anything until I saw Bread Ninja attempting to spread the false claim, on another participant's talk page, that I would have been "uncivil", to the point that she planned to report me, that I had a "problem" that needed "fixing".
I can perfectly understand Bread Ninja's hatred for our inital disagreement with her concerning article content, what I do not accept is her "behind the backs" attempts, since the discussion ended, to rewrite history and to put us all in the roles of the bad guys, and to jump on every single occasion to accuse us of something, or even to sets us against each other. I ended up being accused of "uncivility", even though Bread Ninja herself doesn't seem to have any problem to call us all a "bunch of biased fans". I just told her that this behavior, libelling us while trying to make people unfamiliar with the topic take sides even after the discussion was ended (and that's when I mentionned your own talk page, Arbiter) wouldn't get her anywhere.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas back at you :)

Merry Christmas, The Arbiter! May you be blessed with a full plate and a joyous spirit!
I hope that this Christmas season is one of celebration and rest for you and your family.  fetchcomms 00:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you don't mind, I've fixed your template to provide the date along with your signature (as you were substing it). Feel free to change it back if it causes issues though :)  fetchcomms 00:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry... Just thought you'd like a date like with normal signing. Oh well.  fetchcomms 00:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Some lemon cookies in a cup for you! If you are allergic to lemon cookies, please return them for some File:Grasshoppercupcakes.JPG!

Thank you very much for the barnstar!  fetchcomms 00:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much delayed barnstar

The Article Rescue Barnstar
For the work and major cleanup, and thereby saving Windows Police Pro BlueVista (talk) 15:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]