Talk:Comparison of TeX editors: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:29, 31 December 2009

Computing: Software List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

I started this table (inspired by the wikimatrix) and I hope others will help populate it. And correct any mistakes etc. Hopefully people will find it useful too. Thanks. Simplifix (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. I added a row for Editing Style. It may be that it makes more sense to have a separate table for WYSIWYM editors, but I haven't used LyX enough to be the person to create one. Theodore.norvell (talk) 12:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fill in the Scientific Workplace column. I found some of the rows need more explanation.

configurable There are many ways an editor could be configurable. E.g. in Scientific Workplace there are 2 kinds of keyboard macros and you can configure the meaning of the function keys, not to mention being able to configure the WYSIWYM display, so I supposed it to be configurable.
inverse search I know what this means, but many would not. (Perhaps I should fix this my self.)
intelligent error handling What does this mean? (The word intelligent is really over used in computing. Perhaps there is a more meaningful phrase that would do better.)
parenthesis matching Matching braces isn't relevant to WYSIWYM editors. Likewise (largely) for matching \begin and \end. Scientific Workplace treats blocks defined by \left and \right as single objects for the purpose of selection (and also some blocks defined by \begin and \end, for example arrays), so I put "yes". Theodore.norvell (talk) 12:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for everyone's contributions. A couple of comments:

configurable indeed there are many ways an editor could be configurable, and if someone would like to think of a few, we could make a few rows on configurability into a separate table (on the same page)
parenthesis matching while I was mostly thinking of braces in writing latex code {...}, how many times has one seen things like f(sin(x), with a missing (or extra) close parenthesis for example, and parenthesis matching helps pick that up too.
By intelligent error handling I really meant the ability to find the error in the latex file. And to walk through the errors in the file (with a next error button), but if anyone has strong feelings on this one I don't!

Simplifix (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any MeWa users who can add info for it? PuerExMachina (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 * By ''intelligent error handling'' I really meant the ability to find the error in the latex file. And to walk through the errors in the file (with a next error button), but if anyone has strong feelings on this one I don't!
 [[User:Simplifix|Simplifix]] ([[User talk:Simplifix|talk]]) 21:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
+Are there any MeWa users who can add info for it? [[User:PuerExMachina|PuerExMachina]] ([[User talk:PuerExMachina|talk]]) 04:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)