Jump to content

User talk:Belovedeagle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Koliber (talk | contribs)
Line 3: Line 3:
I was wondering if you could copy edit [[2007 Groundhog Day tornado outbreak]]. [[User:Richard|<font face="Times New Roman" color="blue">''Richard''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Richard|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</small> 12:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could copy edit [[2007 Groundhog Day tornado outbreak]]. [[User:Richard|<font face="Times New Roman" color="blue">''Richard''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Richard|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</small> 12:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
:Sure, I'll see what I can do. [[User:Belovedeagle|Belovedeagle]] ([[User talk:Belovedeagle#top|talk]]) 19:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
:Sure, I'll see what I can do. [[User:Belovedeagle|Belovedeagle]] ([[User talk:Belovedeagle#top|talk]]) 19:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

== History of the family ==

I'm somewhat interested in copyediting [[history of the family]] and *may* begin to do so over the next few days. I ran into confusion early on, though. I'm not sure if you wrote this sentence (and I'm too lazy to figure it out), but do you know the intended meaning of "For the definition of family, residency is carefully examined and the family is described in terms of the household." in the second paragraph? I would like to rephrase that but I don't have access to the source. [[User:Belovedeagle|Belovedeagle]] ([[User talk:Belovedeagle|talk]]) 00:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
: Yes please correct all the mistakes in this article. That above sentence was to indicate the default and kind of universal criteria of family.[[User:Koliber|Koliber]] ([[User talk:Koliber|talk]]) 18:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:26, 5 January 2010

Hey there

I was wondering if you could copy edit 2007 Groundhog Day tornado outbreak. Richard (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll see what I can do. Belovedeagle (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of the family

I'm somewhat interested in copyediting history of the family and *may* begin to do so over the next few days. I ran into confusion early on, though. I'm not sure if you wrote this sentence (and I'm too lazy to figure it out), but do you know the intended meaning of "For the definition of family, residency is carefully examined and the family is described in terms of the household." in the second paragraph? I would like to rephrase that but I don't have access to the source. Belovedeagle (talk) 00:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please correct all the mistakes in this article. That above sentence was to indicate the default and kind of universal criteria of family.Koliber (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]