Talk:Radical honesty: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:51, 6 January 2010

Reads like an advdertisement.66.61.26.164 (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the spelling error in your complaint, yes, it does read like an advertisement. If you can propose a better way of writing it, please go ahead. As it is, it is just fine as far as I am concerned. I would like an admin's point of view, though. Flash Man999 (talk) 06:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first poster is right. I'm no admin, but this definitely seems to violate the wikipedia neutrality policy.

Also, look at the books regarding it; they are all by the same author. It seems pretty biased.

Withoutamartyr (talk) 09:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Reads like an advdertisement.[[Special:Contributions/66.61.26.164|66.61.26.164]] ([[User talk:66.61.26.164|talk]]) 00:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 :Besides the spelling error in your complaint, yes, it does read like an advertisement. If you can propose a better way of writing it, please go ahead. As it is, it is just fine as far as I am concerned. I would like an admin's point of view, though. [[User:Flash man999|Flash Man999]] ([[User talk:Flash man999|talk]]) 06:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
+The first poster is right. I'm no admin, but this definitely seems to violate the wikipedia neutrality policy.
+Also, look at the books regarding it; they are all by the same author. It seems pretty biased.
+[[User:Withoutamartyr|Withoutamartyr]] ([[User talk:Withoutamartyr|talk]]) 09:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)