Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:51, 16 January 2010

Simulation12

Simulation12 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12/Archive.

Report date January 16, 2010, 17:44 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

Mayme08 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by --Mikey (talk) 17: 53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't think Mayme08 is a sockpuppet of Simulation12 cause Mayme started using Wikipedia in December 2008 Simulation12 used user names based on his Simulation account I don't think Simulation12 used those accounts. So I don't think Mayme08 is a sockpuppet of Simulation12. --Mikey (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what brought this matter to your attention? Your accounts edit history only goes back two weeks, but Mayme08 was blocked ten months ago. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mayme08 can't be Simulation12 look at her edits and compare it with Simulation12 I don't think they're exactly the same cause Mayme08 did not edit what Simulation12 edit. Mayme08 created an account just for herself not to sockpuppet from another user. I don't think that's Simulation12 period. --Mikey (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from being dead wrong, you didn't answer my question at all. What brought this matter to your attention? Beeblebrox (talk) 20:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to ask why is Mayme08 a sockpuppet of Simulation12 and please you don't have to be upset I asked nicely. --Mikey (talk) 20:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )

Current status –

Self-endorsed by clerk for Checkuser attention.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Clerk note: endorsed for checkuser on BetsyandKevin89 and Simulation12, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 20:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Mayme08 can't be Simulation12 look at her edits and compare it with Simulation12 I don't think they're exactly the same cause Mayme08 did not edit what Simulation12 edit. Mayme08 created an account just for herself not to sockpuppet from another user. I don't think that's Simulation12 period. --[[User:BetsyandKevin89|Mikey]] ([[User talk:BetsyandKevin89|talk]]) 20:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 :Aside from being dead wrong, you didn't answer my question at all. What brought this matter to your attention? [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 20:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
+I came here to ask why is Mayme08 a sockpuppet of Simulation12 and please you don't have to be upset I asked nicely. --[[User:BetsyandKevin89|Mikey]] ([[User talk:BetsyandKevin89|talk]]) 20:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 ;Comments by other users