Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:It is being actively discussed as of two second ago.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 21:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC) |
:It is being actively discussed as of two second ago.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 21:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Marvellous. [[user:RMHED|<font style="color:#4682b4">'''Garibaldi Baconfat'''</font>]] 22:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC) |
::Marvellous. [[user:RMHED|<font style="color:#4682b4">'''Garibaldi Baconfat'''</font>]] 22:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Is it being actively actioned, or is that too much to hope for? [[user:RMHED|<font style="color:#4682b4">'''Garibaldi Baconfat'''</font>]] 23:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:29, 16 January 2010
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 7 days ![]() |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 7 days ![]() |
What is the status of the case involving me, Lar and Versageek before AUSC?
I received an email from Tznkai on Dec. 16 saying a report would be posted, giving me half a day to respond. I responded. As far as I know, nothing has happened since. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Your response was taken into account. The case has mostly been sitting, waiting for comment from all auditors, but the holidays seem to have slowed us down considerably. I am hoping it will pick up soon. Your case in particular is our first priority once we have full activity again. Dominic·t 21:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
How is my request progressing ?
It's been over 3 weeks now since the original enquiry and still nothing has been forthcoming. Garibaldi Baconfat 21:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is being actively discussed as of two second ago.--Tznkai (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Marvellous. Garibaldi Baconfat 22:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Is it being actively actioned, or is that too much to hope for? Garibaldi Baconfat 23:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Marvellous. Garibaldi Baconfat 22:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)