User talk:Binzaman: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
If you think that I have "poor and limited" thoughts, come into my head sometime. If that was the case, I wouldn't have in the neighborhood of 15,000 edits on a vast array of subjects. As for double standards, no. Not even close. You came here in an attempt to use this site for expression of your personal point of view. That is strictly not allowed here. Doesn't matter if you think you're right or wrong or not or what the subject is. If the essay was written by a Jew from his point of view, it would have gotten the exact same treatment. Take a look at [[NPOV]] to see what I mean. That having been said, I agree that religious persecution is a crime perpetuated by some of the most ignorant fools in society, to put it charitably. Those who persecute innocent and pious Muslims because of what a bunch of murderers are trying to do to world civilization under the banner of Islam deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 05:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC) |
If you think that I have "poor and limited" thoughts, come into my head sometime. If that was the case, I wouldn't have in the neighborhood of 15,000 edits on a vast array of subjects. As for double standards, no. Not even close. You came here in an attempt to use this site for expression of your personal point of view. That is strictly not allowed here. Doesn't matter if you think you're right or wrong or not or what the subject is. If the essay was written by a Jew from his point of view, it would have gotten the exact same treatment. Take a look at [[NPOV]] to see what I mean. That having been said, I agree that religious persecution is a crime perpetuated by some of the most ignorant fools in society, to put it charitably. Those who persecute innocent and pious Muslims because of what a bunch of murderers are trying to do to world civilization under the banner of Islam deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 05:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
First of all please accept my appology for being ignorant about the NPOV / Wikipedia policy. I was wrong in placing my views over here but i was putting this article for the sake of information for my people only. As i thut wikipedia is a sharing place for ideas etc but sorry for that. |
|||
Secondly i want to tell you that in Islam, No Muslim is allowed to kill a single civilian untill unless that civilian become any life threat aganist any muslim. All the Al-Qaeda stuff is based on US CIA. They are the agents for them. So don't took them as Muslim. But in Phalistinian case all the Israels are invaders, occupiers on muslim's land and a permanent threat for Phalistinian Muslims. |
|||
Also i respect the knowledge you poses. You are respectable for me. Sorry for my words,altough that was not for u spesifically. |
|||
Regards |
|||
Revision as of 08:00, 7 January 2006
Wikipedia is not a place for politcal rallying/propaganda/advertisements. Blnguyen 06:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
As such, it has been deleted. Please do not repost it. - Lucky 6.9 06:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Yeah this shows me your superiority here... you will allow what u like? This is not religious propoganda, pitty on ur poor and limited thoughts, you can lick crime aganist jews over world war but you are insisting crime aganist Muslims as religious Propoganda This is called Double Standerds
If you think that I have "poor and limited" thoughts, come into my head sometime. If that was the case, I wouldn't have in the neighborhood of 15,000 edits on a vast array of subjects. As for double standards, no. Not even close. You came here in an attempt to use this site for expression of your personal point of view. That is strictly not allowed here. Doesn't matter if you think you're right or wrong or not or what the subject is. If the essay was written by a Jew from his point of view, it would have gotten the exact same treatment. Take a look at NPOV to see what I mean. That having been said, I agree that religious persecution is a crime perpetuated by some of the most ignorant fools in society, to put it charitably. Those who persecute innocent and pious Muslims because of what a bunch of murderers are trying to do to world civilization under the banner of Islam deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. - Lucky 6.9 05:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
First of all please accept my appology for being ignorant about the NPOV / Wikipedia policy. I was wrong in placing my views over here but i was putting this article for the sake of information for my people only. As i thut wikipedia is a sharing place for ideas etc but sorry for that. Secondly i want to tell you that in Islam, No Muslim is allowed to kill a single civilian untill unless that civilian become any life threat aganist any muslim. All the Al-Qaeda stuff is based on US CIA. They are the agents for them. So don't took them as Muslim. But in Phalistinian case all the Israels are invaders, occupiers on muslim's land and a permanent threat for Phalistinian Muslims. Also i respect the knowledge you poses. You are respectable for me. Sorry for my words,altough that was not for u spesifically. Regards