Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javacast: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 10:59, 7 January 2006

Javacast

non-notable concept with a single homepage hosted at Geocities. Timecop 07:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Podcast; this doesn't deserve an article in its own right. -- (aeropagitica) UK 07:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Which bits would you merge? Would you consider "delete and redirect" instead? - brenneman ^(t)^(c) 05:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nn. Google brings up a ton-and-a-half of nothing. --Hosterweis 07:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Podcruft. Incognito 07:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per above --Depakote 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, crufty neologism. Proto t c 13:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lol geocities Tapir User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
Delete advertising Jmax- 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes[reply]
Delete what Tapir said. Eusebeus 20:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Ajwebb 22:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -Casting neologisms (and those who create them) will burn in silicon hell. Dan 22:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yet another foocast. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Grr... Timecop, please improve the quality of your nominations a little by providing us with some evidence that you've done your homework. If you provide the links that show that things are not notable, people will take them more seriously and you are more likely to get um, uninvolved people to agree with you. It also wouldn't hurt to space them out a bit more? Fairly low Google, nothing on News. Delete unless evidence of notability provided. - brenneman ^(t)^(c) 01:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page[reply]
Delete per all the above deletion reasons. Cptchipjew 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * Grr... Timecop, ''please'' improve the quality of your nominations a little by providing us with some evidence that you've done your homework.  If you provide the links that show that things are not notable, people will take them more seriously and you are more likely to get um, ''uninvolved'' people to agree with you.  It also wouldn't hurt to space them out a bit more?  Fairly low [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Javacast+phone&meta= Google], nothing on [http://news.google.com.au/news?q=Javacast%20phone&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=wn News].  Delete unless evidence of notability provided. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f">brenneman</font>]][[User Talk:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f"><sup>(t)</sup></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f"><sup>(c)</sup></font>]] 01:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Forallah|Forallah]] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small>
+* '''Delete''' per all the above deletion reasons. [[User:Cptchipjew|Cptchipjew]] 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)