User talk:75.144.70.141: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== February 2010 == |
== February 2010 == |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Genesis creation myth]], you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ''And other related articles. Leave the term 'Myth' alone. It's been discussed at length. Your concerns have been address and dealt with.'' [[User talk:Kingoomieiii|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">King Öomie</span>]] 18:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
|||
:This comment is uncalled for. Two changes don't call for this mis-use of a warning. The term myth has NOT been dealt with. It was "dealt" with last Fall, that myth should remain out, and yet it made it back. Now you think it's dealt with? Why didn't you think it was dealt with last Fall when myth was rejected? [[Special:Contributions/75.144.70.141|75.144.70.141]] ([[User talk:75.144.70.141#top|talk]]) 19:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
:This comment is uncalled for. Two changes don't call for this mis-use of a warning. The term myth has NOT been dealt with. It was "dealt" with last Fall, that myth should remain out, and yet it made it back. Now you think it's dealt with? Why didn't you think it was dealt with last Fall when myth was rejected? [[Special:Contributions/75.144.70.141|75.144.70.141]] ([[User talk:75.144.70.141#top|talk]]) 19:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:52, 12 February 2010
Your changes to Free Reformed Church of North America on November 5, 2007
I have reverted most of you changes in the FRCNA page. Please read the 'discussion' page for details. --Jdeboer (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
February 2010
- This comment is uncalled for. Two changes don't call for this mis-use of a warning. The term myth has NOT been dealt with. It was "dealt" with last Fall, that myth should remain out, and yet it made it back. Now you think it's dealt with? Why didn't you think it was dealt with last Fall when myth was rejected? 75.144.70.141 (talk) 19:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- plus you are an acclaimed athiest (on your user page) so you show your bias towards this article right away.