User talk:Zengar Zombolt: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
TimVickers (talk | contribs) Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Asperger syndrome. using TW |
m Undid revision 343624685 by TimVickers (talk) Autistic trolls are the worst trolls |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I hope that clears things up. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. [[User:SKS2K6|SKS]] ([[User talk:SKS2K6|talk]]) 03:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
I hope that clears things up. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. [[User:SKS2K6|SKS]] ([[User talk:SKS2K6|talk]]) 03:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== February 2010 == |
|||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Asperger syndrome]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 22:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:43, 12 February 2010
allkpop
allkpop.com is first and foremost a blog. It is a news blog, yes, but a blog. It tends to be biased, publishes rumours as fact, and has misleading stories. It really doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources.
I know it's difficult to find a good English sources for K-Pop, but that doesn't mean that poorer ones should be used instead. If you look at the Oh! (album) page, you'll see that an English (actual) news source is used. So it's doable. Normally speaking, though, Korean news sources are used instead on most of these pages.
I hope that clears things up. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. SKS (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)