User talk:Zengar Zombolt: Difference between revisions
→FYI: added |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
You left a templated [[WP:COI]] warning on [[User talk:SteveBaker#Asperger Syndrome| Steve Baker's]] talk page. In case you are not aware, it is not considered good form on WP to [[WP:Do not template the regulars| template]] the long-term users, and there are few contributors more regular or more prolific that Mr Baker. If you have a question about something he is doing, a personal note citing your specific concern is much more likely to attract an appropriate response. As an aside, one does not have a conflict of interest just because one has a personally-related interested in a topic, or no one with a heart condition could write about Cardiac care, or photographers about photography. [[User:Bielle|Bielle ]] ([[User talk:Bielle|talk]]) 23:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
You left a templated [[WP:COI]] warning on [[User talk:SteveBaker#Asperger Syndrome| Steve Baker's]] talk page. In case you are not aware, it is not considered good form on WP to [[WP:Do not template the regulars| template]] the long-term users, and there are few contributors more regular or more prolific that Mr Baker. If you have a question about something he is doing, a personal note citing your specific concern is much more likely to attract an appropriate response. As an aside, one does not have a conflict of interest just because one has a personally-related interested in a topic, or no one with a heart condition could write about Cardiac care, or photographers about photography. [[User:Bielle|Bielle ]] ([[User talk:Bielle|talk]]) 23:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
I will also note that edit summaries such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZengar_Zombolt&action=historysubmit&diff=343624870&oldid=343624685 this] are highly undesirable. Please do not launch any personal attacks against any user, or any group of people. Thank you. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 23:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:36, 12 February 2010
allkpop
allkpop.com is first and foremost a blog. It is a news blog, yes, but a blog. It tends to be biased, publishes rumours as fact, and has misleading stories. It really doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources.
I know it's difficult to find a good English sources for K-Pop, but that doesn't mean that poorer ones should be used instead. If you look at the Oh! (album) page, you'll see that an English (actual) news source is used. So it's doable. Normally speaking, though, Korean news sources are used instead on most of these pages.
I hope that clears things up. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. SKS (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
FYI
You left a templated WP:COI warning on Steve Baker's talk page. In case you are not aware, it is not considered good form on WP to template the long-term users, and there are few contributors more regular or more prolific that Mr Baker. If you have a question about something he is doing, a personal note citing your specific concern is much more likely to attract an appropriate response. As an aside, one does not have a conflict of interest just because one has a personally-related interested in a topic, or no one with a heart condition could write about Cardiac care, or photographers about photography. Bielle (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)