Talk:ABL (gene): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== v-abl and c-abl |
== v-abl and c-abl == |
||
== |
|||
Why is the first word about v-abl? viral abl is not the only gene under the umbrella of Abl gene (name of article) |
Why is the first word about v-abl? viral abl is not the only gene under the umbrella of Abl gene (name of article) |
||
Revision as of 16:11, 13 February 2010
Template:WikiProject GeneticsTemplate:Wikiproject MCB
Template:Cell Signaling Project
why was this given a low rating? Translocation of abl is sufficient to induce leukemia...
it just seems abl is rated low because the article is not well-developed; that doesn't seem appropriate
Gacggt 22:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
why do you use the term "transcript" to describe the tyrosine kinase (protein) activity? [... The bcr-abl transcript is also a tyrosine kinase, which activates mediators...]? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vardos (talk • contribs) 16:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Transcript instead of protein?
why do you use the term "transcript" to describe the tyrosine kinase (protein) activity? [... The bcr-abl transcript is also a tyrosine kinase, which activates mediators...]? --Vardos (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
v-abl and c-abl
Why is the first word about v-abl? viral abl is not the only gene under the umbrella of Abl gene (name of article)