Modular multiplicative inverse: Difference between revisions
It said gdc instead of gcd |
|||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
int inverse_mod (int a, int m) { |
int inverse_mod (int a, int m) { |
||
int x = |
int x = extended_gcd (&a, m); |
||
if (a) |
if (a) |
||
return (x + m) % m; |
return (x + m) % m; |
Revision as of 19:05, 16 February 2010
The modular multiplicative inverse of an integer a modulo m is an integer x such that
That is, it is the multiplicative inverse in the ring of integers modulo m. This is equivalent to
The multiplicative inverse of a modulo m exists iff a and m are coprime (i.e., if gcd(a, m) = 1). If the modular multiplicative inverse of a modulo m exists, the operation of division by a modulo m can be defined as multiplying by the inverse, which is in essence the same concept as division in the field of reals.
Explanation
When the inverse exists, it is always unique in Zm where m is the modulus. Therefore, the x that is selected as the modular multiplicative inverse is generally a member of Zm for most applications.
For example,
yields
The smallest x that solves this congruence is 4; therefore, the modular multiplicative inverse of 3 (mod 11) is 4. However, another x that solves the congruence is 15 (easily found by adding m, which is 11, to the found inverse).
Computation
Extended Euclidean Algorithm
The modular multiplicative inverse of a modulo m can be found with the extended Euclidean algorithm. The algorithm finds solutions to Bézout's identity
where a, b are given and x, y, and gcd(a, b) are the integers that the algorithm discovers. So, since the modular multiplicative inverse is the solution to
by the definition of congruence, m | ax - 1, which means that m is a divisor of ax - 1. This, in turn, means that
Rearranging produces
with a and m given, x the inverse, and q an integer multiple that will be discarded. This is the exact form of equation that the extended Euclidean algorithm solves—the only difference being that gcd(a, m)=1 is predetermined instead of discovered. Thus, a needs to be coprime to the modulus, or the inverse won't exist. The inverse is x, and q is discarded.
This algorithm runs in time O(log(m)2), assuming |a|<m, and is generally more efficient than exponentiation.
Direct Modular Exponentiation
The direct modular exponentiation method, as an alternative to the extended Euclidean algorithm, is as follows:
According to Euler's theorem, if a is coprime to m, that is, gcd(a, m) = 1, then
where φ(m) is Euler's totient function. This follows from the fact that a belongs to the multiplicative group (Z/mZ)* iff a is coprime to m. Therefore the modular multiplicative inverse can be found directly:
This method is generally slower than the extended Euclidean algorithm, but is sometimes used when an implementation for modular exponentiation is already available. Some disadvantages of this method include:
- the required knowledge of φ(m), whose most efficient computation requires m's factorization. Factorization is widely believed to be a mathematically hard problem.
- exponentiation. Though it can be implemented more efficiently using modular exponentiation, which is a form of binary exponentiation, it is still a taxing operation with computational complexity O(log φ(m)).
Implementation in Python
def extended_gcd(a, b):
x, last_x = 0, 1
y, last_y = 1, 0
while b:
quotient = a // b
a, b = b, a % b
x, last_x = last_x - quotient*x, x
y, last_y = last_y - quotient*y, y
return (last_x, last_y, a)
def inverse_mod(a, m):
x, q, gcd = extended_gcd(a, m)
if gcd == 1:
# x is the inverse, but we want to be sure a positive number is returned.
return (x + m) % m
else:
# if gcd != 1 then a and m are not coprime and the inverse does not exist.
return None
Implementation in C
int extended_gcd (int * a, int b) {
int x = 0, lastx = 1;
int y = 1, lasty = 0;
int temp;
div_t q;
while (b) {
q = div (*a, b);
*a = b;
b = q.rem;
temp = x;
x = lastx - q.quot * x;
lastx = temp;
temp = y;
y = lasty - q.quot * y;
lasty = temp;
}
return lastx;
}
int inverse_mod (int a, int m) {
int x = extended_gcd (&a, m);
if (a)
return (x + m) % m;
return 0;
}
Example
>>> a = 1234
>>> m = 9997
>>> inverse_mod(a, m)
3119
>>> (a * inverse_mod(a, m)) % m
1