Jump to content

User talk:Wikipeacekeeper: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Stop pea cocking Soviet war in Afghanistan please
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:::Sorry, the typo was because I did a mass revert. The stuff I removed was badly typed out with all kinds of typos and posted by an anonymous IP address who was blatantly POV pushing. Aout the Afghan war, they beat the Russians. [[User:Wikipeacekeeper|Wikipeacekeeper]] ([[User talk:Wikipeacekeeper#top|talk]]) 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Sorry, the typo was because I did a mass revert. The stuff I removed was badly typed out with all kinds of typos and posted by an anonymous IP address who was blatantly POV pushing. Aout the Afghan war, they beat the Russians. [[User:Wikipeacekeeper|Wikipeacekeeper]] ([[User talk:Wikipeacekeeper#top|talk]]) 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
::::Again, avoid peacock terms in Soviet war in Afghanistan. Engaging in edits wars vs discussion is disruptive and may end up in you being blocked. [[User:NJA|<em style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:#6600CC">'''NJA'''</em>]] <small> [[User talk:NJA|<em style="color:#63D1F4">'''(t/</em>]][[Special:Contributions/NJA|<em style="color:#63D1F4">c)</em>]]'''</small> 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
::::Again, avoid peacock terms in Soviet war in Afghanistan. Engaging in edits wars vs discussion is disruptive and may end up in you being blocked. [[User:NJA|<em style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:#6600CC">'''NJA'''</em>]] <small> [[User talk:NJA|<em style="color:#63D1F4">'''(t/</em>]][[Special:Contributions/NJA|<em style="color:#63D1F4">c)</em>]]'''</small> 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
:OK, what's a "peacock" term? And why is it one? [[User:Wikipeacekeeper|Wikipeacekeeper]] ([[User talk:Wikipeacekeeper#top|talk]])

Revision as of 08:33, 17 February 2010

February 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NJA (t/c) 08:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which one are you talking about? Wikipeacekeeper (talk) 08:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Soviet war in Afghanistan. Also, Operation Storm, among the edits that likely need discussed, you also created a typo in the word 'language'. NJA (t/c) 08:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the typo was because I did a mass revert. The stuff I removed was badly typed out with all kinds of typos and posted by an anonymous IP address who was blatantly POV pushing. Aout the Afghan war, they beat the Russians. Wikipeacekeeper (talk) 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, avoid peacock terms in Soviet war in Afghanistan. Engaging in edits wars vs discussion is disruptive and may end up in you being blocked. NJA (t/c) 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, what's a "peacock" term? And why is it one? Wikipeacekeeper (talk)