User talk:Garbolia

user — talk — contributions Archives 2009 September - Present WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call Hello, fellow film fan! This is to ask for your input on Balalaika, MGM 1939. Though I'm a good editor/copy writer and have been working on it since August (09), this is my first major research project of any description, anywhere. User talk:Nehrams2020 has been kind enough to help me, and I'm hoping you will look the article over; I would really appreciate your comments and suggestions, especially additional free sources of information/photos, to round it off nicely. Thank you, Shir-El too 15:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Hello Shir-El too, sorry I didn't reply you earlier as I haven't logged in for a while. Your article is very professional. You are right, Nehrams2020 is very nice.Maybe he can help you with more insight of your article. Thank you for contacting me. If you have extra time, I would appreciate your suggestions as well. Best regards!--Garbolia (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Thank you! Better late than never!! Just finished James Hill (British director), best known for Born Free; he actually had a diverse body of work, yet there's almost nothing available on him. Strange. What would you like me to look at? Cheers! Shir-El too 19:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Wow, it is amazing that you put up so much information there. It must be a lot of work! I edited for movie Empress Vampire. I am going to wait for more edits after the movie goes to Cannes this year. Keep up the great work! --Garbolia (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Proposed deletion of China Spy The article China Spy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Future film not in production. Appears to fail WP:NFF. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 02:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Articles for deletion nomination of China Spy I have nominated China Spy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Spy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC) The film article should not exist at this point. For upcoming films, we do not include them until a reliable source (or more) can be found stating that filming has started. There are many film articles that get announced and then have issues with the size of the budget, actors dropping out, or studios going bankrupt and then never end up getting made (or are delayed). Instead of having all of these film articles that just get announced and then are never actually made, we wait until there is confirmation. Rarely does production cease once filming has started. In notable cases, these failed productions can still have articles. For this article, I would recommend copying all of the formatting to a user page (along with current sources), and when you find a reliable source or two that states that filming has started, go ahead and re-create the article. You can learn more about preparing future film articles at our designated department. Let me know if you need any further clarification. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks, Nehrams!--Garbolia (talk) 08:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC) I think it is reasonable. I have removed it to a user page. Thanks Nehrams2020!--Garbolia (talk) 20:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Ange Maya The article Ange Maya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Non-notable actress lacking GHits of substance and zero GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ACTOR. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 05:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC) The person herself has already requested to delete her name and the page from wiki long time ago.--Garbolia (talk) 08:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)