User talk:Kno CunninLynguists: Difference between revisions
TheJazzDalek (talk | contribs) revert incivility |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Edit warring == |
== Edit warring == |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] "Words and angry nerd would say."|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 20:21, 27 February 2010 ( |
|||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:A Piece of Strange|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:A Piece of Strange]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:"We can do this all day." Actually, no, you can't.|"We can do this all day." Actually, no, you can't.|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 20:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:26, 27 February 2010
I suppose that you have a point, although policies of verifiability regarding sampling by/of recording artists have generally been lax throughout Wikipedia. If this truly is Kno, why don't you provide an official list of samples? I'm sure that it would be much appreciated by many.--Hoops gza (talk) 10:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Warning
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to A Piece of Strange, you will be blocked from editing. Ccrazymann (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to A Piece of Strange, you will be blocked from editing. Ccrazymann (talk) 20:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Edited and cited. - Kno
January 2010
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Template:Do not delete Stifle (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Edit warring
"Words and angry nerd would say."|}} TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2010 (