Inherency (policy debate): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Policy Debate}} |
{{Policy Debate}} |
||
'''Inherency''' is a [[stock issues|stock issue]] in [[policy debate]] that refers to a barrier that keeps a [[harms|harm]] from being solved in the [[status quo]]. |
'''Inherency''' is a [[stock issues|stock issue]] in [[policy debate]] that refers to a barrier that keeps a [[harms|harm]] from being solved in the [[status quo]]. |
||
There are three main types of inherency: |
|||
:*'''Structural inherency''': Laws or other barriers to the implementation of the plan. |
|||
:*'''Attitudinal inherency''': Beliefs or attitudes which prevent the implementation of the plan. |
|||
:*'''Existential inherency''': The plan hasn't happened yet. |
|||
Despite the classification of these three as the "main types" of inherency, the existence of other types are subject to theory (much like a substantial part of the lexicon for the event). |
|||
{{Stock Issues}} |
{{Stock Issues}} |
||
[[Category:Policy debate]] |
[[Category:Policy debate]] |
||
Revision as of 17:17, 11 January 2006
| Policy debate |
|---|
| Organization |
| Format |
| Argument types |
 Policy debate |
Inherency is a stock issue in policy debate that refers to a barrier that keeps a harm from being solved in the status quo.
There are three main types of inherency:
- Structural inherency: Laws or other barriers to the implementation of the plan.
- Attitudinal inherency: Beliefs or attitudes which prevent the implementation of the plan.
- Existential inherency: The plan hasn't happened yet.
Despite the classification of these three as the "main types" of inherency, the existence of other types are subject to theory (much like a substantial part of the lexicon for the event).