Talk:Low-noise amplifier: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:21, 10 March 2010

Shouldn't it say "biasing is done by low value resistors?"

•Well, low value resistors would throw in lots of noise and ruin the input match. Typically not a good idea. Large resistors allow the cirucit to be biased and nothing more. Guerberj (talk) 04:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very general description of the amplifier. Also HEMT should be pHemt, or at least add pHEMT and mHEMT. I am looking into revising this input with putting up some microwave designs in a MMIC design as well as standard microstrip. —--Wallace (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Revision as of 04:20, 10 March 2010 edit Guerberj (talk \| contribs) 439 edits Responded to resistor bias ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:21, 10 March 2010 edit undo Guerberj (talk \| contribs) 439 edits m Fixed Comment Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Shouldn't it say "biasing is done by low value resistors?"		Shouldn't it say "biasing is done by low value resistors?"

	~~·Well~~, low value resistors would throw in lots of noise and ruin the input match. Typically not a good idea. Large resistors allow the cirucit to be biased and nothing more. [[User:Guerberj\|Guerberj]] ([[User talk:Guerberj\|talk]]) 04:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)		•Well, low value resistors would throw in lots of noise and ruin the input match. Typically not a good idea. Large resistors allow the cirucit to be biased and nothing more. [[User:Guerberj\|Guerberj]] ([[User talk:Guerberj\|talk]]) 04:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)