Talk:Ecotropism: Difference between revisions
←Created page with 'Should we move the science definition to the being primary one? I appreciate that the person who introduced the definition that comes first at the moment claims to...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we move the science definition to the being primary one? I appreciate that the person who introduced the definition that comes first at the moment claims to have invented the word, and so knows its first meaning, but a swift Google search for ecotropic reveals that the vast majority of hits relate to the far more common science usage, and the other hits relate only to one poet. Should we change the article to reflect this? [[Special:Contributions/131.111.186.95|131.111.186.95]] ([[User talk:131.111.186.95|talk]]) 10:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) |
Should we move the science definition to the being primary one? I appreciate that the person who introduced the definition that comes first at the moment claims to have invented the word, and so knows its first meaning, but a swift Google search for ecotropic reveals that the vast majority of hits relate to the far more common science usage, and the other hits relate only to one poet. Should we change the article to reflect this? [[Special:Contributions/131.111.186.95|131.111.186.95]] ([[User talk:131.111.186.95|talk]]) 10:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
I've moved the scientific definition to being the primary one. I feel justified in doing this as I notice that the article [[Ecotropics]] was deleted from wikipedia, and there is no article about the man who invented this philosophy (which, if it were as important as the article implied, I'm sure there would be). I haven't removed the information completely as I don't know why the Ecotropics article was deleted. [[Special:Contributions/131.111.186.95|131.111.186.95]] ([[User talk:131.111.186.95|talk]]) 17:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:27, 10 March 2010
Should we move the science definition to the being primary one? I appreciate that the person who introduced the definition that comes first at the moment claims to have invented the word, and so knows its first meaning, but a swift Google search for ecotropic reveals that the vast majority of hits relate to the far more common science usage, and the other hits relate only to one poet. Should we change the article to reflect this? 131.111.186.95 (talk) 10:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I've moved the scientific definition to being the primary one. I feel justified in doing this as I notice that the article Ecotropics was deleted from wikipedia, and there is no article about the man who invented this philosophy (which, if it were as important as the article implied, I'm sure there would be). I haven't removed the information completely as I don't know why the Ecotropics article was deleted. 131.111.186.95 (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)