Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/UsersList: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
listing RFC candidate |
moved to correct place |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--New at top, please--> |
<!--New at top, please--> |
||
;Candidate pages (user) |
;Candidate pages (user) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
;Certified pages (user) |
;Certified pages (user) |
||
*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Prestonmcconkie|Prestonmcconkie]]''': It is alleged that this editor is frequently offensive and insulting via edit summaries, and has been entirely non-responsive to queries about this from several editors over several months. 18:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC) |
*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Prestonmcconkie|Prestonmcconkie]]''': It is alleged that this editor is frequently offensive and insulting via edit summaries, and has been entirely non-responsive to queries about this from several editors over several months. 18:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Michael H 34|Michael H 34]]''': It is alleged that Michael H 34, while civil, has shown longterm evidence of advocacy and disruptive editing on articles related to fathers' and men's rights. 15:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Michael H 34|Michael H 34]]''': It is alleged that Michael H 34, while civil, has shown longterm evidence of advocacy and disruptive editing on articles related to fathers' and men's rights. 15:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Wuhwuzdat|Wuhwuzdat]]''': It is alleged that Wuhwuzdat improperly gave an "only warning" to a user acting in good faith, refused to discuss or accept other user comments on the scenario, and has not taken long-term advice on civilty and avoiding biting other users. 22:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC) |
*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Wuhwuzdat|Wuhwuzdat]]''': It is alleged that Wuhwuzdat improperly gave an "only warning" to a user acting in good faith, refused to discuss or accept other user comments on the scenario, and has not taken long-term advice on civilty and avoiding biting other users. 22:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 05:26, 15 March 2010
- Candidate pages (user)
- Tom Reedy: It is alleged that TomReedy, teaming with user:Nishidani, has engaged in wp:NPA, wp:HOUND, wp:LAWYER, wp:LEGAL, exhibiting blatant disregard for WP:CIVIL and several other violations. 05:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Certified pages (user)
- Prestonmcconkie: It is alleged that this editor is frequently offensive and insulting via edit summaries, and has been entirely non-responsive to queries about this from several editors over several months. 18:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- PCPP: It is alleged that PCPP behaves outside Wikipedia norms in editing pages related to Falun Gong and the Chinese Communist Party, including deleting vast amounts of content, failing to engage in meaningful discussion, restoring information that has no sources, ignoring consensus or ongoing discussion on talk pages, accusing others of bad faith, etc. 01:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Newman Luke: It is alleged that Newman Luke ignores various wikipedia policies and consensus and unilaterally makes significant and disputed changes to Judaism and Biblical articles against existing consensus. 16:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Cush (second RFC): "it is alleged that Cush has been in blatant disregard of WP:CIVIL and several other related violations. 21:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Michael H 34: It is alleged that Michael H 34, while civil, has shown longterm evidence of advocacy and disruptive editing on articles related to fathers' and men's rights. 15:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wuhwuzdat: It is alleged that Wuhwuzdat improperly gave an "only warning" to a user acting in good faith, refused to discuss or accept other user comments on the scenario, and has not taken long-term advice on civilty and avoiding biting other users. 22:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)