Talk:Minima Moralia: Difference between revisions
Pollinosisss (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Problems: new section |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
To describe the work as "a seminal text in Critical Theory" does not seem entirely accurate. Even though related to critical theory, I fail to see this work as an attempt in theory, or as an attempt in science overall, rather than as an attempt in philosophy. Or perhaps I have not fully understood the meaning of the concept "Critical Theory", but if this work represents "Critical Theory", then "Critical Theory" has misused if not misunderstood the whole concept of theory. |
To describe the work as "a seminal text in Critical Theory" does not seem entirely accurate. Even though related to critical theory, I fail to see this work as an attempt in theory, or as an attempt in science overall, rather than as an attempt in philosophy. Or perhaps I have not fully understood the meaning of the concept "Critical Theory", but if this work represents "Critical Theory", then "Critical Theory" has misused if not misunderstood the whole concept of theory. |
||
== Problems == |
|||
Although I like most of what this article has to say, there are basic problems with it, for example, not even such basic information as the original German-language date of publication/title are given; and much of the information seems to be subjective analysis without adequate citation of whose analysis this is (obviously Adorno, for example, doesn't directly make a comparison between Mussolini and Berlusconi, etc.). ([[Special:Contributions/93.41.128.99|93.41.128.99]] ([[User talk:93.41.128.99|talk]]) 01:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
Revision as of 01:38, 18 March 2010
 | Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Continental Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To describe the work as "a seminal text in Critical Theory" does not seem entirely accurate. Even though related to critical theory, I fail to see this work as an attempt in theory, or as an attempt in science overall, rather than as an attempt in philosophy. Or perhaps I have not fully understood the meaning of the concept "Critical Theory", but if this work represents "Critical Theory", then "Critical Theory" has misused if not misunderstood the whole concept of theory.
Problems
Although I like most of what this article has to say, there are basic problems with it, for example, not even such basic information as the original German-language date of publication/title are given; and much of the information seems to be subjective analysis without adequate citation of whose analysis this is (obviously Adorno, for example, doesn't directly make a comparison between Mussolini and Berlusconi, etc.). (93.41.128.99 (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC))
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Unknown-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophical literature articles
- Unknown-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Unknown-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Continental philosophy articles
- Unknown-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles