User talk:Miesianiacal: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::And I see from your dismissal of criticism of your editing habits as "aggressive response", you continue to beleive you're immune to Wkipedia policy and guidelines. I sincerely hope you're going to rectify that very soon. --<span style="border-top:1px solid black;font-size:80%">[[User talk:Miesianiacal|<span style="background-color:black;color:white">'''Ħ'''</span>]] [[User:Miesianiacal|<span style="color:black">MIESIANIACAL</span>]]</span> 19:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC) |
:::And I see from your dismissal of criticism of your editing habits as "aggressive response", you continue to beleive you're immune to Wkipedia policy and guidelines. I sincerely hope you're going to rectify that very soon. --<span style="border-top:1px solid black;font-size:80%">[[User talk:Miesianiacal|<span style="background-color:black;color:white">'''Ħ'''</span>]] [[User:Miesianiacal|<span style="color:black">MIESIANIACAL</span>]]</span> 19:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::No such dismissal; no such belief. Regardless of the rightness or wrongness of your criticisms of me, your response was aggressive -- a lashing back against the suggestion that ''your'' attitude and actions are problematic. Ironically, this response of yours is typical of your troublesome mode of interaction of with other editors, about which you need to think. -- [[Special:Contributions/205.250.72.215|205.250.72.215]] ([[User talk:205.250.72.215|talk]]) 01:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC) |
::::No such dismissal; no such belief. Regardless of the rightness or wrongness of your criticisms of me, your response was aggressive -- a lashing back against the suggestion that ''your'' attitude and actions are problematic, rather than any evident consideration of that suggestion. Ironically, this response of yours is typical of your troublesome mode of interaction of with other editors, about which you need to think. -- [[Special:Contributions/205.250.72.215|205.250.72.215]] ([[User talk:205.250.72.215|talk]]) 01:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:24, 2 April 2010
|
Monarchy of CanadaI've looked into your background on Wikipedia and I must say that you have quite a rap-sheet for edit-warring -- yet there you are on Monarchy of Canada, at it yet again, against multiple users (I mean the name-account ones), and hypocritically issuing "warnings" against it, which quite frankly come across as hostile, under the circumstances, especially in conjunction with your hyperbolic accusations. I think you need to relax and recognize the right of other editors to edit. If you are half a vehement as you come across, you are going to ruin your health. You seem to be getting terribly upset over some fairly minor changes in wording, relating to some fairly straightforward history. It should not be seen as problematic for other editors to try out different wording, and this sort of minor tweaking should not need lengthy discussion on the talk-page. I strongly suggest that you cease and desist from so persistently putting things back as you, personally, want them. Please, for your own sake as well as for the good of Wikipedia, consider your history of conflicts with other editors -- the escalating blocks you've had, the reams and reams of arguing and its tendency to turn personally nasty, the continual involvement of administrators in one way or another. If you look at it honestly, trying to be objective, you should see that you, and your behaviour and attitude, are the common denominator. This stuff is not helping the project, and I don't see how it can be doing you any good, either. Sincerely, 205.250.72.215 (talk) 17:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
|